Don't get me started!
On 5/24/2017 16:26, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
You should see what people do with my last name!
Dan Matyola
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
No problem. A lot of people do.
Paul via phone
On May 24, 2017, at 3:47 PM, Gonz wrote:
Yeah, I got it
was nicer than now on anyways.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
I'll just say Paul from now on!
Actually he's from Michigan (;+>
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message ----- From: "Gonz"
Subject: Re: h
A "u" here and in Sweden, at least since the 1880s.
Paul via phone
> On May 24, 2017, at 4:43 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> And it’s Stenquist, no i ;-)
>
> There is so an 'i', right after the 'u' that is probably supposed to be a 'v'.
>
>>
>> Paul Stenquist
>
>
Don't have the K-1, but give me until late August and I'll check out the
K-3. Not dark enough at night here now.
Jostein
Den 24.05.2017 16.52, skrev Gonz:
Anybody try this with the K-1? Is the Pentax 5-axis image
stabilization this good?
https://petapixel.com/2017/05/23/gorgeous-10-second-mil
Paul Stenquist wrote:
And it’s Stenquist, no i ;-)
There is so an 'i', right after the 'u' that is probably supposed to be
a 'v'.
Paul Stenquist
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
The worst that happens with my name is replacement of "z" with "s".
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> You should see what people do with my last name!
>
> Dan Matyola
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> No problem. A lot of people do.
>>
>>
You should see what people do with my last name!
Dan Matyola
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> No problem. A lot of people do.
>
> Paul via phone
>
> > On May 24, 2017, at 3:47 PM, Gonz wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, I got it wrong quite a few times. My brain adds those extra
> >
Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>>>>> I'll just say Paul from now on!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually he's from Michigan (;+>
>>>>
>>>> Kenneth Waller
>>>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
Kenneth Waller
>>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>>>
>>> - Original Message - From: "Gonz"
>>> Subject: Re: handheld long exposures
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Damn... can't get it right... sorry a
ally he's from Michigan (;+>
>>
>> Kenneth Waller
>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "Gonz"
>> Subject: Re: handheld long exposures
>>
>>
>>
>>> Damn... ca
.com/kennethwaller
>
> - Original Message - From: "Gonz"
> Subject: Re: handheld long exposures
>
>
>
>> Damn... can't get it right... sorry again... I'll just say Paul from now
>> on!
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:35
I'll just say Paul from now on!
Actually he's from Michigan (;+>
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Gonz"
Subject: Re: handheld long exposures
Damn... can't get it right... sorry again... I&#
-Original Message----- From: Gonz
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 4:52 PM
>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> Subject: handheld long exposures
>>>
>>>
>>> Anybody try this with the K-1? Is the Pentax 5-axis image
>>> stabilization this
e:
>> Paul shouldn't have too much trouble!
>>
>> Alan C
>>
>> -Original Message- From: Gonz
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 4:52 PM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: handheld long exposures
>>
>>
>> An
dnesday, May 24, 2017 4:52 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: handheld long exposures
>
>
> Anybody try this with the K-1? Is the Pentax 5-axis image
> stabilization this good?
>
> https://petapixel.com/2017/05/23/gorgeous-10-second-milky-way-photo-shot-hand-held/
Paul shouldn't have too much trouble!
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Gonz
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 4:52 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: handheld long exposures
Anybody try this with the K-1? Is the Pentax 5-axis image
stabilization this good?
https://petapixe
Anybody try this with the K-1? Is the Pentax 5-axis image
stabilization this good?
https://petapixel.com/2017/05/23/gorgeous-10-second-milky-way-photo-shot-hand-held/
--
-- Photography takes an instant out of time, altering life by holding
it still. Dorothea Lange
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Tonight I tried some experiments that while not an abject failure, were not
terribly successful either. I put my camera on a tripod and tried some long
exposures of musicians. On a few of them I tried using my flash. I tried the
AF50 triggered by hand, and triggered wirelessly, as well as on
Ah well one myth busted :-)
Tnx for the info
Patrick
On 10/20/06, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20/10/06, Patrick Genovese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does the sensor heat up aprecably during an exposure? if so that may
> > be the root of the myth possibly with older
On 20/10/06, Patrick Genovese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does the sensor heat up aprecably during an exposure? if so that may
> be the root of the myth possibly with older sensors that used to heat
> up more than the current crop.
It shouldn't, a frame readout CCD sensor is essentially static d
Patrick
On 10/20/06, Cory Papenfuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've heard here and there that such long exposures are not
> > reccommended due to risk of damage to the sensor.. Is this true ?
> > i've tried a few searches on the subject but could not f
On 20/10/06, Patrick Genovese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone had experience with really long exposures on DSLRs ie
> exposures running into several minutes maybe even hours.
Long exposures are not advisable. Sensor noise is cumulative so
eventually every (w
> I've heard here and there that such long exposures are not
> reccommended due to risk of damage to the sensor.. Is this true ?
> i've tried a few searches on the subject but could not find any
> conclusive information.
>
In my experience trying to do some
I have done long exposures with my E-500. I havent
tried hours but 1.5 minutes isnt too bad.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
Hi,
Has anyone had experience with really long exposures on DSLRs ie
exposures running into several minutes maybe even hours.
I've heard here and there that such long exposures are not
reccommended due to risk of damage to the sensor.. Is this true ?
i've tried a few searches on the s
A question for the LXers:
What's the longest (ballpark figure) successful exposure
you've made using the LX's automatic, direct-metering mode?
Although I've grown to trust the AE mode in conventional
photo situations, around New Year's I tried out its low-
light capabilities for the first time. I
From: "Stephen Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 11:28 AM
Subject: LX: Long exposures on auto
> A question for the LXers:
>
> What's the longest (ballpark figure) successful exposure
>
I have also used the LX for long time AE night shots, up to probably 4 or 5
minutes and I have also wondered whether Pentax has built in some
compensation for the reciprocity error that no doubt exists for such long
exposures.
As the Impresa is a print film and from your description of the '
** Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:42:44 -0500
** From: "Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
**
** ...
** dusk with Velveta and had, what looked to me, like perfectly exposed
** ...
**
** Christian
**
Can't call them cheesy shots 'cause
ng as good as it is, I have never bothered to really study the Kodak.
hth,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 5:28 PM
Subject: LX: Long exposures
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Moore"
Subject: LX: Long exposures on auto
> A question for the LXers:
>
> What's the longest (ballpark figure) successful exposure
> you've made using the LX's automatic, direct-metering mode?
The longest I h
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Patrick White wrote:
> I've used the same procedure. When the light meter in the K-1000 shut off
> for lack of light, I punted and used spot meter mode of my PZ-1p body as a
> light meter since it is more sensitive. Without it, I would have had to
> guess -- I probably
light meter
> for high speed
> films and low shutter speeds like 1/4 sec. If that is the
> situation, then
> the trick described above will be of no use to determine the
> duration of
> long exposures.
I've used the same procedure. When the light meter in the K-1000
27;t bother making small
exposure
changes change by at least 2 stops and depend on the film latitude to help you
out. Since you're using these long exposures you are probably taking
photos of rather static
subjects so taking a series of 5 shots would be my recommendation. True
this doe
I found a copy of his book "Time Exposed" with it's dust jacket torn at
a discount bookstore for $10 a number of years ago. I opened it to a
random page, fell in love with the image (one of his movie theatre
interiors) and bought it immediately.
His photographs of wax sculptures are sort of cree
Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> On 10 May 2001, at 17:54, Fabrice Gamberini wrote:
>> I too find long exposures quite fascinating and I have discovered recently the
>> work of Hiroshi Sugimoto, a Japanese photog who used to take pictures in movie
&
to take reciprocity into account, of course.
>
> I too find long exposures quite fascinating and I have discovered recently
> the work of Hiroshi Sugimoto, a Japanese photog who used to take pictures in
> movie theatres, excepted that he chose to expose the entire duration of the
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
>
> Basicly, as I see your situation, the main problem you seem to
> have encountered (and learned from, too ;^) is that your meter
> (as all meters) offers the exposure which will yield a "standard
> scene/18% grey" rendi
On 10 May 2001, at 17:54, Fabrice Gamberini wrote:
> I too find long exposures quite fascinating and I have discovered recently the
> work of Hiroshi Sugimoto, a Japanese photog who used to take pictures in movie
> theatres, excepted that he chose to expose the entire duration of
pear as ghostly figures against a very solid background).
You have to take reciprocity into account, of course.
I too find long exposures quite fascinating and I have discovered recently
the work of Hiroshi Sugimoto, a Japanese photog who used to take pictures in
movie theatres, excepted t
Ayash Kanto wrote:
> The room was made absolutely dark, so I don't think the light meter got
> affected while taking the first shot. Rob's explaination for the
> overexposure of the first shot seems logical. And in the second shot, it
> was bulb mode exposure, so lightmeter is out of the picture
On 10 May 2001, at 18:38, Ayash Kanto Mukherjee wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Aheeem! I have a question here. When I took my first shot with 2 sec
> exposure, the camera recorded the track of the seconds hand. If I do a 256
> sec exposure (say), shall I be able to record the circular track of the
> second
Hi!
Aheeem! I have a question here. When I took my first shot with 2 sec
exposure, the camera recorded the track of the seconds hand. If I do a 256
sec exposure (say), shall I be able to record the circular track of the
seconds hand? If yes, it would be a spectacular photo, atleast for me.
Any
Are you covering the eye piece? I understand that light coming thru the eye
piece on long exposures messes up the metering. My PZ-70 mentions this in
the manual AND the camera comes with a cover. Unfortunately, you have to
remove the rubber ring about the eyepiece so I usually cover with black
Hi Boz!
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
> Decreasing the aperture and increasing the time accordingly will NORMALLY
> produce a picture with the same brightness. You have to EITHER close the
> aperture OR decrease the time.
>
> Now, why didn't this happen with your second shot?
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Rob Studdert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll have a go (I hope there aren't 100's of replies preceding mine). Firstly the
> initial over-exposure would most probably have been due to the camera
> metering setting the exposure to achieve an overall 18% gray. Since I
> assume that a
When the exposure is that long, it's subject to the reciprocity failure
of the film. That could be anywhere from one to two stops, depeniding on
the emulsion. Try 128 and 256 second exposures at f22.
Paul
Ayash Kanto Mukherjee wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I was trying to photograph the dial of my table c
> On 10 May 2001, at 11:13, Ayash Kanto Mukherjee wrote:
>
> > My next experiment was to decrease the aperture by 5 stops, i.e., f/22 and
> > therefore the exposure has to be increased by 5 stops, i.e., 64 sec. I got
> > a very horrible result. It was severely underexposed.
Decreasing the apert
48 matches
Mail list logo
