All three showed up here.
On 2/26/2021 13:44:00, Alan C wrote:
Simplifying. Won't go.
"The theory was that the mirror slap was so loud it would push a person
backwards and result in unsharp photos".
Reminds me of a chap here who claimed the spotlights on his bakkie were so
powerful
"The theory was that the mirror slap was so loud it would push a person
backwards and result in unsharp photos".
Reminds me of a chap here who claimed the spotlights on his bakkie were
so powerful (bright) he couldn't get into his garage until he turned
then off!
Alan C
On 25-Feb-21 10:19
Trying again.
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Looking for funny text about 67 mirror slap
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 18:46:51 +0200
From: Alan C
To: pdml@pdml.net
"The theory was that the mirror slap was so loud it would push a person
backwards and r
Simplifying. Won't go.
"The theory was that the mirror slap was so loud it would push a person
backwards and result in unsharp photos".
Reminds me of a chap here who claimed the spotlights on his bakkie were
so powerful (bright) he couldn't get into his garage until he turned
then off!
On Fri., Feb. 26, 2021, 7:16 a.m. David J Brooks,
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 5:22 PM Ralf R Radermacher
> wrote:
>
> > Am 25.02.21 um 22:14 schrieb mike wilson:
> >
> > >
> > > I feel this thread may be a thinly-disguised party for bashing
> > > the Pentax 67.
> >
> > Exactly. Thanks a
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 5:22 PM Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
> Am 25.02.21 um 22:14 schrieb mike wilson:
>
> >
> > I feel this thread may be a thinly-disguised party for bashing
> > the Pentax 67.
>
> Exactly. Thanks a lot. A friend has bought a used 6x7, although I think
> it is a fake. It has
> On 25 February 2021 at 21:01 Bill wrote:
>
>
> No, and I thought I had heard every joke about the 6x7. It sounds like
> something Mike Johnston would come up with.
>
> bill
Someone wh worked for Delphi.
I feel this thread may be a thinly-disguised party for bashing
the Pentax 67.
If so,
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.photo.equipment.medium-format/c/Cwpq_aGDLnU?pli=1
Scroll all the way down to the post of Jun 14, 1997, 8:00:00 AM by Danny
Gonzalez. He quotes a post from the rec.photo.equipment.medium-format (Yahoo?)
newsgroup of 9 months previously. It has the quote you are
Am 25.02.21 um 22:14 schrieb mike wilson:
I feel this thread may be a thinly-disguised party for bashing
the Pentax 67.
Exactly. Thanks a lot. A friend has bought a used 6x7, although I think
it is a fake. It has paint on all corners. ;-)
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne,
It could also part crowds.
Decades ago, I was in DC on a lovely morning and decided I wanted to get a
different angle on the Lincoln Memorial. I took my film 35 mm SLR out of
my camera bag and started wandering around, just looking through the
viewfinder from various vantage points. I never got
No, and I thought I had heard every joke about the 6x7. It sounds like
something Mike Johnston would come up with.
bill
On Thu., Feb. 25, 2021, 2:19 p.m. Ralf R Radermacher,
wrote:
> Way back there used to be a text somewhere in the internet, joking about
> the 67's mirror slap and somethong
Way back there used to be a text somewhere in the internet, joking about
the 67's mirror slap and somethong the author called sonic subject
relocation or some such. The theory was that the mirror slap was so loud
it would push a person backwards and result in unsharp photos.
Does anyone on here
12 matches
Mail list logo
