Thanks, Gonz. Some of that is motion blur--I was
shooting at 1/20, and for some reason the K10D's shake
reduction didn't make the subjects hold still! ;-)
--- Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aesthetically, I love the shot, great capture. And
> I love the B&W
> version. Technically, its back
Ditto
Dave
On Jan 21, 2008 4:25 PM, Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aesthetically, I love the shot, great capture. And I love the B&W
> version. Technically, its back focused (see the brick?), but not too
> badly.
>
> gonz
>
>
> On 1/20/08, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We went to
Aesthetically, I love the shot, great capture. And I love the B&W
version. Technically, its back focused (see the brick?), but not too
badly.
gonz
On 1/20/08, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We went to a recently opened addtion to the Philly
> Museum of Art this afternoon, and I came up
te:
> Rick: When I saw Loving Chimp, I thought I was
> going to see . . . well, you
> know. You got me. I prefer the BW for this shot.
> Fun catch. Did you
> intend a softer focus here? Cheers, Christine
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: &quo
Rick: When I saw Loving Chimp, I thought I was going to see . . . well, you
know. You got me. I prefer the BW for this shot. Fun catch. Did you
intend a softer focus here? Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Womer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent:
I like the shot. B&W seems better to me for this. Also the shot
seems just a bit soft - I'd see about sharpening just a bit more.
Other than that, nicely captured.
--
Bruce
Sunday, January 20, 2008, 3:33:07 PM, you wrote:
RW> We went to a recently opened addtion to the Philly
RW> Museum of A
We went to a recently opened addtion to the Philly
Museum of Art this afternoon, and I came upon this
couple.
Color:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6860585
B&W:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6860584
I'm not sure whether I prefer the color or the
monochrome version.
K10D, DA
7 matches
Mail list logo