- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: MY defintion of obsolete - its way different than those
suggested
I agree.
Which one do you want?
William Robb
To me, truly obsolete is something that has been replaced
by something else that is equal or superior in EVERY
aspect for same or less money, CURRENT NEW COST.
If the new item has even one shortcoming or costs more than the old
one isnt truly obsolete.
This is based on buying new products of
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: MY defintion of obsolete - its way different than those
suggested
To me, truly obsolete is something that has been replaced
by something else that is equal or superior in EVERY
aspect for same or less money, CURRENT NEW COST
suggested
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 18:48:05 -0600
- Original Message - From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: MY defintion of obsolete - its way different than those
suggested
To me, truly obsolete is something that has been replaced
by something else that is equal or superior in EVERY
aspect
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: MY defintion of obsolete - its way different than those
suggested
No one asked for truly obsolete, just plain old obsolete. Obsolete is in
the mind of the beholder (user).
Then there is found obsolescence, where your fleet
I agree.
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: MY defintion of obsolete - its way different than those
suggested
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:20:19 -0600
- Original Message - From: Tom C
Subject
- its way different than those
suggested
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: MY defintion of obsolete - its way different than those
suggested
To me, truly obsolete is something that has been replaced
by something else that is equal or superior in EVERY
7 matches
Mail list logo
