Thanks, Mark. I'll look forward to seeing your photo.
Doug
At 7:00 AM -04006/11/01, Mark Roberts brandished a favorite crayon and scribbled:
>Very nice, Doug.
>
>I'm going to submit a "North Carolina Rhododendron" photo of my own for the next
>PUG.
>
>Mark Roberts
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
As
Joe,
I probably shot that at f/11 or f/16. Turns out it was not shot with the MZ-S, but
rather my LX, as I pried the slide mount open to get a peek at the imprinted info, so
the subject line is a mistake. I could have sworn I shot it with the MZ-S. hmmm.
Anyway...
The FA100/2.8 Macro is a sh
Bob Rapp
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 7:15 AM
Subject: Re: MZ-S and FA200/4 Macro
> Doug, I've just gotten a 100 mm. macro myself, and am playing off depth
> of field (f
Doug, I've just gotten a 100 mm. macro myself, and am playing off depth
of field (f-stops 16-32) vs. sharpness (f-stops around 5.6-11). This
photo looks like it has a lot of depth of field for a 200 mm. macro.
What f-stop did you use?
I keep reading that macro lenses are designed to be sharpest s
uot;.
Pål
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Brewer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 5:14 AM
Subject: MZ-S and FA200/4 Macro
> Don't want to steal any of Mark's well-deserved thunder, but his posting images from
>Grandfather
5 matches
Mail list logo
