Hi,
With function 15 set to 1, there is no discernable imprint on
Kodachrome 25, although it prints perfectly clearly on 64.
And WR is right - it does sound like a hamster sneezing.
mike
Hi,
Having difficulty with mail here, so resent; apologies if this
is a repeat.
Hi,
With function 15 set to 1, there is no discernable imprint on
Kodachrome 25, although it prints perfectly clearly on 64.
And WR is right - it does sound like a hamster sneezing.
mike
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:10:30PM +0100, Kristian Walsh wrote:
Thanks for the answers.
Mine has that halo, but only on negative film; on transparency film
it's perfectly sharp.
So it seems mine isn't the only one that does this.
With PF15 set to 1 I've got this smudge on Fuji Superia 100
Tim Preston a écrit:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:10:30PM +0100, Kristian Walsh wrote:
Thanks for the answers.
.
On a slightly different tack, does anyone know if the IR remote for the
BG-10 actually exists. This was a surprise feature to me and seems like
a good idea, but I've never
Michel Carrère-Gée a écrit:
Tim Preston a écrit:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:10:30PM +0100, Kristian Walsh wrote:
Thanks for the answers.
.
On a slightly different tack, does anyone know if the IR remote for the
BG-10 actually exists. This was a surprise feature to me and seems
Shouldn't you set this PF to 1, so that the camera automatically adjusts
for the film speed? That's what I do, and I get no ghosting problems
that I know of.
-Original Message-
From: John Coyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
For your problem, set the data imprinting intensity, function
First of all, being new here, I'd Just like to say hello =)
I've been using an SF-7 for a number of years that I bought secondhand as
a camera that could do a reasonable job of point shoot yet would let
me twiddle with everything. It did the job I asked it to do.
Now I've bought myself an
Hi Tim,
on 23 Sep 02 you wrote in pentax.list:
First of all, being new here, I'd Just like to say hello =)
Welcome!
The imnprinting seems to be surrounded by a sort of 'halo' or smudge which
tends to make it very difficult to read. Is this normal, or has my
camera got some sort of fault in
Tim wrote:
The imnprinting seems to be surrounded by a sort of 'halo' or smudge which
tends to make it very difficult to read. Is this normal, or has my
camera got some sort of fault in the imprinting device?
Mine does not have a halo. It's very easy to read. Try a different film to make
Mine has that halo, but only on negative film; on transparency film
it's perfectly sharp.
--
Kristian
On Monday, Sep 23, 2002, at 19:11 Europe/Dublin, Pål Jensen wrote:
Tim wrote:
The imnprinting seems to be surrounded by a sort of 'halo' or smudge
which
tends to make it very difficult
without it
and especially without good light.
Brad Dobo
- Original Message -
From: Tim Preston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:25 PM
Subject: Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question
First of all, being new here, I'd Just like to say hello
Welcome Tim - this can be a really good group, if a little intense at
times!
For your problem, set the data imprinting intensity, function 15, at a
lower level - I have mine set to 3 at the moment, and for 400ASA film
this is too high. Basically, the data imprinting led's are creating
flare
12 matches
Mail list logo