Whoever remembers the problem I've had with my scanner, which quit
creating readable by PS TIFF files - I think it will be interesting to
know... Fortunately for me, i wasn't the only one that suffered from
this... People on photo.net
(http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00End6&tag
Thanks -- I shall investigate.
> >From what I have read, the lamp for Minolta scanners can be easily replaced
> by users. It could be obtained from Minolta.
>
> Regards,
> Alan Chan
> http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
> >
> >I'm sure you're right about the lamp going, since the problem has become
>
From what I have read, the lamp for Minolta scanners can be easily replaced
by users. It could be obtained from Minolta.
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I'm sure you're right about the lamp going, since the problem has become
much
worse now!
It's a shame, too; I haven't used this
Herb wrote:
> it sounds like the lamp is going. incidentally, how long do you let the
> scanner warm up before using it. even with negatives, i would let it warm up
> about 5 to 10 minutes before using it. that's a separate issue from your
> problem. i noticed on my prior scanner, a Microtek 35t, t
I have and use that scanner. I only use Vuescan software with it and
have not noticed anything like you mentioned. You might try a
download of Vuescan (www.hamrick.com) - trial software is free and see
if it makes any difference. If you still see the same problem with
that, I would guess you hav
Anyone familiar with the Minolta Scan Dual II? I have one (don't care for it
much, so haven't used it much.) Anyway, I was using it recently and found that
when I scan a strip of negatives the scans vary in density even though the
negatives are the same. In all cases, the #1 image is very dark,
6 matches
Mail list logo
