Re: More pyro pix OT (no Pentax content)

2003-03-30 Thread Steve Desjardins
These are well done. I especially liike 3, 6, &7. It's unfortunate (but true) that terrible events make great photos.

Re: More pyro pix OT (no Pentax content)

2003-03-30 Thread CBWaters
man, Cory Waters - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 1:15 PM Subject: More pyro pix OT (no Pentax content) > Scanned from crappy 1hr prints and on Nikon, so forgive the quality: > > http://members.

Re: More pyro pix OT (no Pentax content)

2003-03-30 Thread David Mann
Peter from sunny Brighton wrote: > Tomorrow Stan & I will be taking the air in Chichester. Not stopping off in Bognor, I hope . I wanted to wander around Chichester but only ended up going straight through a few times. I guess that 30mUKP needs to be reallocated. Free *ist-D's for the entire

Re: More pyro pix OT (no Pentax content)

2003-03-29 Thread Camdir
Indeed Bob. Being on the coast does't help, there's usually at least a gentle breeze to help fan the flames. I should add that the West Pier has been in disrepair for many years, so in a way, this is the kindest thing that has happened. Given that there is about GBP30m allocated to rebuild it

Re: More pyro pix OT (no Pentax content)

2003-03-28 Thread Rfsindg
Hell of a fire Peter! Bob S. Camdir writes: > Scanned from crappy 1hr prints and on Nikon, so forgive the quality: > > http://members.aol.com/camdir/burn2.jpg > http://members.aol.com/camdir/burn3.jpg > http://members.aol.com/camdir/burn4.jpg > http://members.aol.com/camdir/burn5.jpg > http://me