On 09/09/2013 7:41 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
ebay item 231050936281
While I didn't own that lens, I was able to use one when I was living in
Calgary. Apparently a local photographer had bought one, used it for a
project, and then was trying to sell it. I played with the thing for a
couple of
Yet, oddly enough, an ounce of gold weighs more than an ounce of
feathers. Go figure.
On 9/11/2013 5:26 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
a pound of feathers, gold only has twelve troy oz per pound.
On 9/10/2013 9:08 PM, John wrote:
Which weighs more a pound of gold or a pound of feathers?
On 9/10/2
a pound of feathers, gold only has twelve troy oz per pound.
On 9/10/2013 9:08 PM, John wrote:
Which weighs more a pound of gold or a pound of feathers?
On 9/10/2013 7:35 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:48:42PM -0400, John wrote:
So much more affordable when you think of it a
Depends on the bird.
Obviously cormorant plumage is the most expensive and the heaviest, pound for
pound, in the world because of its very high beauty content.
It is also remarkable that if you drop a cormorant off the Tower of Pisa in a
vacuum, it follows a rapid perpendicular arc towards th
Where did you mine that little nugget from?
I have the feeling this thread is not going to pan out.
On 9/10/13, Larry Colen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:08:49PM -0400, John wrote:
>> Which weighs more a pound of gold or a pound of feathers?
>
> Feathers, but that was a nice troy.
>
>>
>>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:08:49PM -0400, John wrote:
> Which weighs more a pound of gold or a pound of feathers?
Feathers, but that was a nice troy.
>
> On 9/10/2013 7:35 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:48:42PM -0400, John wrote:
> >>So much more affordable when you think o
Which weighs more a pound of gold or a pound of feathers?
On 9/10/2013 7:35 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:48:42PM -0400, John wrote:
So much more affordable when you think of it as costing $430.43 per ounce.
The web says that gold is now worth $1,365/oz, so it's not even
w
Thanks, Larry. I'll look into that. I'm still getting used to gmail. I
used to subscribe to the list via my yahoo address.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
> testing...1,2,3 ...
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:48:42PM -0
testing...1,2,3 ...
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:48:42PM -0400, John wrote:
>> So much more affordable when you think of it as costing $430.43 per ounce.
>
> The web says that gold is now worth $1,365/oz, so it's not even
> worth it's weight in
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:48:42PM -0400, John wrote:
> So much more affordable when you think of it as costing $430.43 per ounce.
The web says that gold is now worth $1,365/oz, so it's not even
worth it's weight in gold. unless you're talking 10KT gold,
which seems to be about that.
http://www.ca
So much more affordable when you think of it as costing $430.43 per ounce.
On 9/9/2013 9:56 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
it weighs 11.5 pounds.
"Photography's greatest handicap is the ease with which the medium as
such can be learned. As a result, too many budding neophytes learn to
speak the langu
10, 2013 8:42 AM
> Subject: Re: Most expensive used lens Ive ever seen
>
> View of the lens on a camera: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tochi/328150/
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 06:56:05PM -0700, Brendan MacRae wr
No; that's a view of a camera on the lens.
- Original Message -
From: Darren Addy
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: Most expensive used lens Ive ever seen
View of the lens on a camera: http://www.flickr.com/photos/
View of the lens on a camera: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tochi/328150/
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 06:56:05PM -0700, Brendan MacRae wrote:
>> it weighs 11.5 pounds.
>
> And costs 50465 of them.
>
> By the way Brendan, it would be improve rea
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 06:56:05PM -0700, Brendan MacRae wrote:
> it weighs 11.5 pounds.
And costs 50465 of them.
By the way Brendan, it would be improve readability if your .sig started
with a line of just "-- \n"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signature_block
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3676#
it weighs 11.5 pounds.
"Photography's greatest handicap is the ease with which the medium as
such can be learned. As a result, too many budding neophytes learn to
speak the language too long before they have anything to say." - Will
Connell
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:41 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
>
ebay item 231050936281
--
J.C. O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
--
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
17 matches
Mail list logo