Well, I'm sure the MZ50 is a fine camera but I wouldn't trade my Z20 for one,
vibrator or not :-).
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Brian Walters wrote:
>
> > I'v
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Brian Walters wrote:
> I've seen good Z20's go for as little as $50 while the much less
> capable MZ-50 seems to have no trouble in fetching $100 or more.
That's because the MZ-50 has a shutter, while the Zs have a vibrator.
If you are ok with the cripple, the MZ-50 is a fi
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling"
Subject: Re: My (underestimated) old friends
New is better than old, ask just about anyone.
I never met a Z series camera that I liked, so even 50 bucks is to rich for
me.
William Robb
>
> I'm amazed at how little
New is better than old, ask just about anyone.
Brian Walters wrote:
> Interesting group photos.
>
> I'm amazed at how little the Z-series sell for these days. I've seen good
> Z20's go for as little as $50 while the much less capable MZ-50 seems to have
> no trouble in fetching $100 or more.
>
Mmm I'd love to look at those bodies myself at home :)
Lovely, really :p
2007/2/11, Margus Männik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> had to make some pictures of Lensbabies... as lighting was already set,
> played a bit with some other items too.
>
> http://www.eol.ee/~margus/misc/pentax_b.jpg
> http:
Interesting group photos.
I'm amazed at how little the Z-series sell for these days. I've seen good
Z20's go for as little as $50 while the much less capable MZ-50 seems to have
no trouble in fetching $100 or more.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydne
Hi,
had to make some pictures of Lensbabies... as lighting was already set,
played a bit with some other items too.
http://www.eol.ee/~margus/misc/pentax_b.jpg
http://www.eol.ee/~margus/misc/pentax_l.jpg
Not modern any more, not classics yet...
BR, Margus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
7 matches
Mail list logo
