Re: My M42 equipment

2004-01-10 Thread Paul Stenquist
Message- From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: January 10, 2004 4:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:FS: My M42 equipment I didn't think I was holding back just because of the K incompatibility, but I guess I was. I'm going to buy an *istD and perhaps

Re: My M42 equipment

2004-01-11 Thread frank theriault
m: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: My M42 equipment Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 20:40:21 -0500 The K mount compatibility won me over. And the res-up software that's now available. From what I've read I can now shoot with a

Re: FS: My M42 equipment

2004-01-10 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Paul ... you refer to the lenses that you're selling as SMC Pentax. Them's be "K" lenses, m'friend. Is that what you're selling? Or do you mean SMC Takumar? Paul Stenquist wrote: > [...] I will be selling some of my screw mount cameras > and lenses. > SMC Pentax 17/4 fisheye lens. This is the

Re: FS: My M42 equipment

2004-01-10 Thread Paul Stenquist
You're right of course. I mean Super Multi-Coated Takumar lenses. I should have at least included the Takumar designation. All are screwmount lenses. No K mount. On Jan 10, 2004, at 5:22 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: Paul ... you refer to the lenses that you're selling as SMC Pentax. Them's be "K

Re: FS: My M42 equipment

2004-01-10 Thread Paul Stenquist
As Shel pointed out, all of these lenses, with the exception of the 17/4 fisheye, should be described as Super Multi-Coated Takumars. The 17/4 is a Fisheye Takumar. Paul On Jan 10, 2004, at 4:45 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: I didn't think I was holding back just because of the K incompatibility, b