- Original Message -
From: "David Chang-Sang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 3:40 PM
Subject: RE: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Read this before
you spend all your $$$)
> Next TOPDML Jeff :)
Yea, we ha
stuff
now.
Jim A.
> From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 13:44:44 -0700
> To: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re[2]: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Read this before
> you spend all
William,
The one thing that you can tell from the little screen is if you
totally blew the shot. Not that helpful for an experienced
photographer. I'm finding that lately I'm using my Coolpix 990 less
and less. It was very fun for awhile and then it kind of wore off.
Neither my wife or I use i
here it's placed
> (i.e. mounted, framed vs non mounted not framed)
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Robb
> Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 2:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Sorry, I added a space in the wrong place.
The Canon forum can be found at www.dpreview.com
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital (
ced
> (i.e. mounted, framed vs non mounted not framed)
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Robb
> Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 2:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: My reas
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Read this before
you spend all your $$$)
> - Original Message -
>
]On Behalf Of William Robb
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 2:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Read this
before you spend all your $$$)
- Original Message -
From: Jeff
Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital
> My daughter works at
- Original Message -
From: Jeff
Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital
> My daughter works at Canada's Wonderland as a "photographer".
> For the second year in a row the regulation camera is the G1.
> People are paying a minimum of $15 CDN for prints coming out
of these
> cameras. I'
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Read this before
you spend all your $$$)
> - Original Message -
> From: Herb Chong
> Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Rea
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong
Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Read
this before you spend all your $$$)
>
> yes. a Canon G1 or G2 made a conscious effort to mimic their
35mm P&S
> line's controls. it makes a big difference.
I am
- Original Message -
From: "Paul F. Stregevsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Read this before
you spend all your $$$)
> Cotty,
>
> I thoroughly
Cotty,
I thoroughly enjoyed your insights into the value of digital for
photographers who lack the time to spend scanning et al. I related to it
because I spend too much time color-correcting my tungsten-cast shots.
But if digital is so convenient, why, then, am I nearly always the only
photo
Hi Bob,
Your post was very interesting and I thought I would take some time and
address the issues you raise...
><< http://www.luminous-landscape.com/parable.htm >>
>If you read the above (1 page note) and Cotty's recent reference to a
>luminous-landscape article (longer) comparing the Canon
14 matches
Mail list logo
