Thanks Dave.
On Mar 3, 2007, at 9:45 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
> Congrats Paul. Good photo anyway.
>
> I get $25 per picture in the horse mag i contribute to. Wonder if NYT
> runs an equine page.
>
> LOL
>
> Dave
>
> On 3/1/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I get a credit line that
Congrats Paul. Good photo anyway.
I get $25 per picture in the horse mag i contribute to. Wonder if NYT
runs an equine page.
LOL
Dave
On 3/1/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get a credit line that reads "Paul Stenquist for the New York Times."
> I believe the pay is $150. Not m
>
> From:
> Paul Stenquist
> I get a credit line that reads "Paul Stenquist for the New York
> Times." I believe the pay is $150. Not much, but better than nothing.
> Paul
> On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:22 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
>>
>> From:
>> Paul Stenquist
>> I have a photo and credit on page E9 of
Thanks Stan. I like your perspective on this:-).
Paul
On Mar 1, 2007, at 10:57 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
> You know, that is quite impressive. Your worst shot, a "throw away"
> that didn't fit the theme (you thought), is still good enough to be
> used. Well done.
>
> stan
>
> On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:0
Paul,
Saw the photo. It was fine, don't sweat it. True, the
one of the blonde was better, but we can't have
everything can we?
Except for the guy who just ordered that huge, awesome
Canon tele lens...
Anyway...kudos on NYT shot.
-Brendan
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a
You know, that is quite impressive. Your worst shot, a "throw away"
that didn't fit the theme (you thought), is still good enough to be
used. Well done.
stan
On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:05 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I get a credit line that reads "Paul Stenquist for the New York
> Times."
> I
That would be *created*. ;>]
-P
keith_w wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> You guys are good! I had no idea if it was online or where it might be.
>> In newsprint it's not as saturated or blocky and quite a bit larger,
>> but I'm pleased that it's on the web. Thanks to all for the responses.
Whoa! Congrats!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> You guys are good! I had no idea if it was online or where it might be.
> In newsprint it's not as saturated or blocky and quite a bit larger,
> but I'm pleased that it's on the web. Thanks to all for the responses.
> Paul
> On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Paul Sorenson w
In a message dated 3/1/2007 10:05:48 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here you go!
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/01/fashion/01Fitness.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
http://tinyurl.com/2av2m5
Scroll about halfway down for Paul's photo
-P
Not a bad photo, Paul. Not bad
You guys are good! I had no idea if it was online or where it might be.
In newsprint it's not as saturated or blocky and quite a bit larger,
but I'm pleased that it's on the web. Thanks to all for the responses.
Paul
On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
> Here you go!
>
> http://w
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I get a credit line that reads "Paul Stenquist for the New York Times."
> I believe the pay is $150. Not much, but better than nothing.
> Paul
http://tinyurl.com/2av2m5
That's great, Paul. Congrats.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discus
I get a credit line that reads "Paul Stenquist for the New York Times."
I believe the pay is $150. Not much, but better than nothing.
Paul
On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:22 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>>
>> From:
>> Paul Stenquist
>> I have a photo and credit on page E9 of today's NY Times.
>
> So what does t
On Mar 1, 2007, at 10:01 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
> On 3/1/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 1/3/07, skye, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>>> Looks great! I saw it online. Congrats :)
>>
>> Anyone got a link?
>>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/01/fashion/01Fitness.html
Thanks Scott!
On 3/1/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/3/07, skye, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Looks great! I saw it online. Congrats :)
>
> Anyone got a link?
>
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/01/fashion/01Fitness.html
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
Shoot more film!
--
PDML Pentax-
Congrats ... I was unable to find it online, can you point to where
it might be?
G
On Mar 1, 2007, at 8:12 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I have a photo and credit on page E9 of today's NY Times. That's in
> the
> Thursday Style section. It's probably the weakest of all the shots I
> took at th
Here you go!
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/01/fashion/01Fitness.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
http://tinyurl.com/2av2m5
Scroll about halfway down for Paul's photo
-P
Cotty wrote:
> On 1/3/07, skye, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> Looks great! I saw it online. Congrats :)
>
> Anyone got a link?
>
Looks great! I saw it online. Congrats :)
--skye
On 3/1/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a photo and credit on page E9 of today's NY Times. That's in the
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 1/3/07, skye, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Looks great! I saw it online. Congrats :)
Anyone got a link?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.
>
> From:
> Paul Stenquist
> I have a photo and credit on page E9 of today's NY Times.
So what does the NYT pay single photos like that? And did you get credit?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I have a photo and credit on page E9 of today's NY Times. That's in the
Thursday Style section. It's probably the weakest of all the shots I
took at the exercise class the other night. But that's because the
photo desk gave me bad information. I had only two hours to get ready
for the shoot, an
21 matches
Mail list logo
