On 2/23/2017 7:53 PM, steve harley wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017, at 16:37, Bill wrote:
On 2/23/2017 2:10 PM, steve harley wrote:
On 2017-02-22 17:04 , Bill wrote:
I really don't want to use an A15/3.5 as a short tele.
i really like how short tele macros work on µ4/3 — Pentax-M
1
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017, at 16:37, Bill wrote:
> On 2/23/2017 2:10 PM, steve harley wrote:
> > On 2017-02-22 17:04 , Bill wrote:
> >
> >> I really don't want to use an A15/3.5 as a short tele.
> >
> > i really like how short tele macros work on µ4/3 — Pentax-M
> > 100/4 macro
> > handles really
On 2/23/2017 2:10 PM, steve harley wrote:
On 2017-02-22 17:04 , Bill wrote:
I really don't want to use an A15/3.5 as a short tele.
i really like how short tele macros work on µ4/3 — Pentax-M 100/4 macro
handles really well with focus highlighting, increased effective focal
length and dept
> On Feb 22, 2017, at 12:36 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> John wrote:
>
>> Or else Google translate just has a dirty mind.
>>
>> What I need explained is why new lenses are so much longer than the old
>> ones of the same focal length?
>
> Every lens design is the result of many compromises: Sma
On 2017-02-22 17:04 , Bill wrote:
> I really don't want to use an A15/3.5 as a short tele.
i really like how short tele macros work on µ4/3 — Pentax-M 100/4 macro
handles really well with focus highlighting, increased effective focal
length and depth of field
just ordered a K-mount Panagor
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bill wrote:
I suspect it's not much more problem to teach Lightroom to apply a
correction on import, but I haven't bothered to try yet.
I find myself *adding* vignetting in post much more often than
correcting for it.
Interesting, I've come to hate vignetting the way
On 2/22/2017 4:56 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 22/2/17, Bill, discombobulated, unleashed:
My old A15/3.5 has a stop or more of light fall off in the corners. It
was no big deal to write an action that can be applied to those images.
I suspect it's not much more problem to teach Lightroom to app
On 23 February 2017 at 08:19, Mark Roberts wrote:
> I find myself *adding* vignetting in post much more often than
> correcting for it.
Same here, it's a great creative tool, second only to DOF control IMO.
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay,
On 22/2/17, Bill, discombobulated, unleashed:
>My old A15/3.5 has a stop or more of light fall off in the corners. It
>was no big deal to write an action that can be applied to those images.
>I suspect it's not much more problem to teach Lightroom to apply a
>correction on import, but I haven't
Bill wrote:
>On 2/22/2017 11:36 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>> John wrote:
>>
>>> Or else Google translate just has a dirty mind.
>>>
>>> What I need explained is why new lenses are so much longer than the old
>>> ones of the same focal length?
>>
>> Every lens design is the result of many compromises
On 2/22/2017 11:36 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
John wrote:
Or else Google translate just has a dirty mind.
What I need explained is why new lenses are so much longer than the old
ones of the same focal length?
Every lens design is the result of many compromises: Small vs. large,
expensive vs. ch
John wrote:
>Or else Google translate just has a dirty mind.
>
>What I need explained is why new lenses are so much longer than the old
>ones of the same focal length?
Every lens design is the result of many compromises: Small vs. large,
expensive vs. cheap, tack-sharp vs. just-sharp-enough. As s
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:06:18AM -0500, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Google translate offered this puzzler:
>
> "- K mount mounted, covering image circle of 35 milf size image sensor"
That might explain why it's about twice as long as my 50mm/f1.4 ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
So you're saying the newly announced 50mm f/1.4 will NOT be
significantly larger than the FA 50mm f/1.4 lens?
On 2/22/2017 11:13 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
Pentax-M 50mm f1.7: 63mm x 31mm, 185 gr, manual focus
Pentax DA 50mm f1.8: 63mm x 35.5mm, 122 gr, auto focus
Clearly Pentax engineering has gon
Oh, goodie, they're following in the footsteps of everybody else making
the design bigger heaver and more complex.
On 2/22/2017 10:06 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Google translate offered this puzzler:
"- K mount mounted, covering image circle of 35 milf size image sensor"
Dare I suggest they are
Middle-aged women with whom you would like to reproduce, no less.
> On Feb 22, 2017, at 10:06 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> Google translate offered this puzzler:
>
> "- K mount mounted, covering image circle of 35 milf size image sensor"
>
> Dare I suggest they are targeting shooters of middle
On 2/22/2017 9:06 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Google translate offered this puzzler:
"- K mount mounted, covering image circle of 35 milf size image sensor"
Dare I suggest they are targeting shooters of middle aged women?
That's the Japanese and their weird fetishes for you.
--
PDML Pentax-Disc
Pentax-M 50mm f1.7: 63mm x 31mm, 185 gr, manual focus
Pentax DA 50mm f1.8: 63mm x 35.5mm, 122 gr, auto focus
Clearly Pentax engineering has gone to hell in a hand basket.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Gonz wrote:
> Yeah really. Compactness seemed to have peaked with the M-series,
> then it w
Yeah really. Compactness seemed to have peaked with the M-series,
then it went downhill from there.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:15 AM, John wrote:
> Or else Google translate just has a dirty mind.
>
> What I need explained is why new lenses are so much longer than the old
> ones of the same focal
>What I need explained is why new lenses are so much longer than the old
>ones of the same focal length?
This is perhaps one of the greatest sentences I have read on the PDML.
Yogi Berra would be proud.
:)
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Gonz wrote:
> not just middle aged women, HOT middle aged
not just middle aged women, HOT middle aged women, like Stacey's Mom.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZLfasMPOU4
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Google translate offered this puzzler:
>
> "- K mount mounted, covering image circle of 35 milf size image sensor"
>
> Dare I
Or else Google translate just has a dirty mind.
What I need explained is why new lenses are so much longer than the old
ones of the same focal length?
On 2/22/2017 10:06 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Google translate offered this puzzler:
"- K mount mounted, covering image circle of 35 milf size ima
On 22 February 2017 at 15:06, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Google translate offered this puzzler:
>
> "- K mount mounted, covering image circle of 35 milf size image sensor"
K mount, covering an image circle of 35mm full size image sensor
--
Eric
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
Google translate offered this puzzler:
"- K mount mounted, covering image circle of 35 milf size image sensor"
Dare I suggest they are targeting shooters of middle aged women?
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Bill wrote:
> http://news.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/rim_info/2017/20170222_014592.html
>
>
http://news.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/rim_info/2017/20170222_014592.html
It looks like the FA 50/1.4 is finally being retired.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
th
25 matches
Mail list logo