Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority'

2007-08-25 Thread Paul Stenquist
There's nothing to get, John. Trust me. Paul On Aug 25, 2007, at 5:25 PM, John Sessoms wrote: > From: > Mark Roberts >> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >>> On Aug 25, 2007, at 12:11 AM, Peter Fairweather wrote: >>> >> I thought it might be helpful to give a more accurate >> translation of >

Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority'

2007-08-25 Thread John Sessoms
From: Mark Roberts > Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> On Aug 25, 2007, at 12:11 AM, Peter Fairweather wrote: >> > >> >>> >> I thought it might be helpful to give a more accurate translation of >>> >> "no longer a priority" >>> >> >>> >> Imagine the scene. As far as the eye can see, there is a solid

Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority'

2007-08-25 Thread Mark Roberts
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >On Aug 25, 2007, at 12:11 AM, Peter Fairweather wrote: > >> I thought it might be helpful to give a more accurate translation of >> "no longer a priority" >> >> Imagine the scene. As far as the eye can see, there is a solid sheet >> of ice. The only living things are a pig

Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority'

2007-08-25 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Aug 25, 2007, at 12:11 AM, Peter Fairweather wrote: > I thought it might be helpful to give a more accurate translation of > "no longer a priority" > > Imagine the scene. As far as the eye can see, there is a solid sheet > of ice. The only living things are a pig circling in the sky and > Meph

Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority'

2007-08-25 Thread Peter Fairweather
I thought it might be helpful to give a more accurate translation of "no longer a priority" Imagine the scene. As far as the eye can see, there is a solid sheet of ice. The only living things are a pig circling in the sky and Mephistopheles trying to take a picture of this desolate vista but strug

Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority'

2007-08-24 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 25/08/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Digital Image Studio wrote: > > >http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Pentax_645_Digital_no_longer_priority_news_139145.html > > Hey, in May they announced that the 645D had been scrapped! "No longer > a priority" is an improvement! > ;-)

Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority'

2007-08-24 Thread Mark Roberts
Digital Image Studio wrote: >http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Pentax_645_Digital_no_longer_priority_news_139145.html Hey, in May they announced that the 645D had been scrapped! "No longer a priority" is an improvement! ;-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.n

Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority'

2007-08-24 Thread P. J. Alling
No, but AP certainly is. Of course that could be true even if it weren't reporting this... Digital Image Studio wrote: > On 24/08/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Isn't this like the third time that this has been reported... >> > > Wasting bandwidth or your time am I? > >

Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority'

2007-08-24 Thread Tom C
ews: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority' Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:47:31 -0400 Isn't this like the third time that this has been reported... Digital Image Studio wrote: > http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Pentax_645_Digital_no_longer_priority_news_139145.html > &g

Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority'

2007-08-24 Thread David Savage
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > >Subject: Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority' > >Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:18:28 +1000 > > > >On 24/08/07, P. J. Al

Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority'

2007-08-24 Thread Tom C
That article is just plain abusive, referring to the mockup as a "dummy version". Tom C. >From: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" >Subject: Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digi

Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority'

2007-08-24 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 24/08/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isn't this like the third time that this has been reported... Wasting bandwidth or your time am I? -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO http:/

Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority'

2007-08-24 Thread P. J. Alling
Isn't this like the third time that this has been reported... Digital Image Studio wrote: > http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Pentax_645_Digital_no_longer_priority_news_139145.html > > -- Remember, it’s pillage then burn. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.

Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority'

2007-08-24 Thread Steve Desjardins
I'm sure it's actually no longer a priority for Hoya. That camera division had better start making money. Let's hope the Wal-mart deal works. Steve >>> "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8/24/2007 9:05 AM >>> http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Pentax_645_Digital_no_longer_priorit

News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority'

2007-08-24 Thread Digital Image Studio
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Pentax_645_Digital_no_longer_priority_news_139145.html -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user