Re: Number of focus points (was Re[2]: Pentax WILL produce a digital SLR!

2002-03-27 Thread Mark Roberts
Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, easily impressed with such rubbish as '45 focus points' when a tenth of that number will work perfectly well (or, for our manual focus aficionados, none!). in fact, a manual focus slr has an infinite number of focus points. Yeah, but they're

Re: Number of focus points (was Re[2]: Pentax WILL produce a digital SLR!

2002-03-27 Thread Steve Larson
It makes ya wonder, how did all those photographers get any keepers before auto focus? VBG Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California Bob Walkden wrote: Hi, easily impressed with such rubbish as '45 focus points' when a tenth of that number will work perfectly well (or, for our manual

Re: Number of focus points (was Re[2]: Pentax WILL produce a digital SLR!

2002-03-27 Thread Peter Alling
Luck? At 04:48 AM 3/27/2002 -0800, you wrote: It makes ya wonder, how did all those photographers get any keepers before auto focus? VBG Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California Bob Walkden wrote: Hi, easily impressed with such rubbish as '45 focus points' when a tenth of that number

Re: Number of focus points (was Re[2]: Pentax WILL produce a digital SLR!

2002-03-27 Thread Bill Owens
And, how did they manage to get great sports photos without a 8 fps motordrive? Could it be experience and practice? Bill KG4LOV [EMAIL PROTECTED] Luck? At 04:48 AM 3/27/2002 -0800, you wrote: It makes ya wonder, how did all those photographers get any keepers before auto focus? VBG

Re: Number of focus points (was Re[2]: Pentax WILL produce a digital SLR!

2002-03-27 Thread T Rittenhouse
Well, when you only get one shot, you try to get it right. Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto - Original Message - From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 27,