Re: Number of focus points (was Re[2]: Pentax WILL produce a digital SLR!

2002-03-27 Thread T Rittenhouse
ay, March 27, 2002 7:15 PM Subject: Re: Number of focus points (was Re[2]: Pentax WILL produce a digital SLR! > And, how did they manage to get great sports photos without a 8 fps > motordrive? Could it be experience and practice? > > Bill KG4LOV > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >

Re: Number of focus points (was Re[2]: Pentax WILL produce a digital SLR!

2002-03-27 Thread Bill Owens
And, how did they manage to get great sports photos without a 8 fps motordrive? Could it be experience and practice? Bill KG4LOV [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Luck? > > At 04:48 AM 3/27/2002 -0800, you wrote: > >It makes ya wonder, how did all those photographers get any "keepers" > >before auto focu

Re: Number of focus points (was Re[2]: Pentax WILL produce a digital SLR!

2002-03-27 Thread Peter Alling
Luck? At 04:48 AM 3/27/2002 -0800, you wrote: >It makes ya wonder, how did all those photographers get any "keepers" >before auto focus? >Steve Larson >Redondo Beach, California > >Bob Walkden wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > easily impressed with such rubbish as '45 focus > > > points' when a tenth

Re: Number of focus points (was Re[2]: Pentax WILL produce a digital SLR!

2002-03-27 Thread Steve Larson
It makes ya wonder, how did all those photographers get any "keepers" before auto focus? Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California Bob Walkden wrote: > Hi, > > > easily impressed with such rubbish as '45 focus > > points' when a tenth of that number will work perfectly well (or, for our > > manua

Re: Number of focus points (was Re[2]: Pentax WILL produce a digital SLR!

2002-03-27 Thread Mark Roberts
Bob Walkden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, > >> easily impressed with such rubbish as '45 focus >> points' when a tenth of that number will work perfectly well (or, for our >> manual focus aficionados, none!). > >in fact, a manual focus slr has an infinite number of focus points. Yeah, but the