Re: OT: After a delay...question

2002-03-27 Thread David Spaulding
Have you considered the Omnibounce on the quickflip. They address two different problems. The quickflip helps keep the shadows behind the head, rather than to the side and also helps to reduce redeye. The Omnibounce helps soften and spread the light so that it doesn't look so harsh. A

RE: OT: After a delay...question

2002-03-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
quickflip, and an off hot shoe connector with sync chord when I had the 645n. Cheers, Dave Original Message: - From: David Spaulding [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 10:16:02 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: After a delay...question snip I do have a question here

Re: OT: After a delay...question

2002-03-27 Thread David Spaulding
I would suggest the Lumiquest bouncers. I've seen/tested the stofen and they tend to really diffuse the light, at least with my 283, and as a result, I've got to fiddle with apertures or the flash settings. I've used the Lumiquest Pocket Bouncer to great effect with the stroboframe

Re[2]: OT: After a delay...question

2002-03-27 Thread Bruce Dayton
David, I'm not sure that there is a big difference between the Omni-bounce and the Lumiquest Softbox. I seem to get more consistent exposures with the Lumiquest. For some reason, the Omni-bounce occasionally produced some underexposure. If I were to purchase again I would get the Lumiquest