I agree as well. I have a 13-year-old HP Laserwriter 1012 that just keeps
working. Much faster/better/cheaper than the 3-in-1 color inkjet.
stan
On Dec 22, 2012, at 3:29 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 2:54 PM, steve harley wrote:
>>
>> any super cheap inkjet is a loss-leade
Yes, you can choose from several paper types. I printed the Astronomy
Picture of the Day from today and did one at Glossy Photo Paper and
one at High Gloss Photo Paper using the Costco brand of Glossy Photo
Paper. Both came out identical. The printer is the Model XP-300, btw.
Walt
On Sat, Dec 22
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 2:54 PM, steve harley wrote:
>
> any super cheap inkjet is a loss-leader designed to sell you ink later on;
I agree, but it seems like a failed marketing ploy. Does anyone ever
buy the replacement ink? They always seem to go for a new printer
instead.
> if you get your c
on 2012-12-22 6:24 Walter Hamler wrote
Ever since I quit printing my own ink jet prints and started using
Costco for RA prints, I have been using an older HP 4 in 1 printer. It
proved to be fine other than I could never get the FAX to work, but
that was because of my network provider and I was to
Walt,
Good to hear. WalMart is close by.
Does the Epson let you specify what paper you are using?
My printer is so old I can't control for the paper I've got.
Makes printing a real guessing game.
Your's sounds like a good solution.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Walter Hamler
5 matches
Mail list logo
