It's because the don't look anything like the clowns in the flea circus.
> On 21 Dec 2015, at 14:21, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> Curiously, the scientists failed to explain how they know that fleas
> are interested in photos of clown fish.
>
>> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:52 PM, David Mann wrote:
That's a typical challenge with the "serial" methods of nanolithography:
you can "draw"/fabricate structures on a very small scale (~10 nm), but
covering a large area with those structures is {difficult, expensive,
lengthy, ... }.
But this snippet reminded me of an old joke from my theater ar
Curiously, the scientists failed to explain how they know that fleas
are interested in photos of clown fish.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:52 PM, David Mann wrote:
> It'll be nice if this technique could be scaled up.
>
> http://www.gizmag.com/3d-nanodrip-inkjet-print-smallest-picture/40966/
>
> Che
It'll be nice if this technique could be scaled up.
http://www.gizmag.com/3d-nanodrip-inkjet-print-smallest-picture/40966/
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly abo
4 matches
Mail list logo
