A scroll of mail from Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 06 Feb
2001 07:51:50 -0500
Read it? y
>Actually, he liked the results so much that he shoots it at 50 or 100
>all the time now. I've got to convince him to shoot rolls at 400 and 50
>of the same scene so we can compare prints. :)
i
I've always been a little dissatisfied with the lack of sharpness that
comes with the extra-fine grain of the C-41 process B&W films, however,
this softness is often suitable/desireable for glamourish portraits.
You can often get a lot of enlargement out of those negs without the
image looking g
There are 3 of these B&W/C41 films (Iford,Kodak, & Konica), any thoughts on
the respective merits?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Actually, with proper processing and decent printing, this film is
quite stunning... 35mm looks really good as high as 11 x 14
(I've never printed it larger than that), and I can only guess at
what kind of enlargements I can get out of it in 6x7 (my next
experiment!!)
I am quite pleased with the
If you want to do the processing yourself try Agfa C41
kit. I like it a lot. One kit costs less than $10 and
has capacity for 8 rolls of 135mm/36.
Herbet.
--- Sid Barras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> After further conversations with the "tech" people
> at the pro lab (the
> only one h
Hi All:
After further conversations with the "tech" people at the pro lab (the
only one here in town), and because they can only do color chemistry
enlargements, they are recommending I start using Kodak's 400cn film.
They took me in the back and showed me some poster sized enlargements
they are
6 matches
Mail list logo
