Re: OT: RE: re:, etc.

2006-12-05 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 06/12/06, Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've been noticing this too. > > It's a minor irritation but it is an irritation. A side problem of which is that due to the way some listers reply or how their mailers handle replies make most threaded readers (and the archives) view the r

Re: OT: RE: re:, etc.

2006-12-05 Thread Brian Walters
I've been noticing this too. It's a minor irritation but it is an irritation. Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia Quoting Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Joe, > > None of your message replies have "Re:" on them anymore. Recently > several

OT: RE: re:, etc.

2006-12-05 Thread Tom C
Joe, None of your message replies have "Re:" on them anymore. Recently several other members have joined the list and their replies do not indicate such on the subject line either. While this is not a major issue for me, I do (and I assume some others) frequently use the "Re:" to determine wh