I don't think this sells. It may be true, but the general or periodic use
of profanity "for effect" is not effective in general, in my opinion.
I've worked with exceptional people all my life. They account for a small
percentage of the general scene and for the rest much stiffer get applied
--
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 00:27:58 -0500, Otis Wright, Jr. wrote:
> Today, those using profanity consistently [...]
I didn't say using it consistently, though that may have been implied
by the reference to Tom's message. Short words and long words are both
tools.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
=damn=
At 12:27 AM -05001/11/03, Otis Wright, Jr. wrote, or at least typed:
>I don't think this sells. It may be true, but the general or periodic use
>of profanity "for effect" is not effective in general, in my opinion.
>I've worked with exceptional people all my life. They account for a s
You rang, ;-)
Doug Brewer wrote:
> =damn=
>
> At 12:27 AM -05001/11/03, Otis Wright, Jr. wrote, or at least typed:
> >I don't think this sells. It may be true, but the general or periodic use
> >of profanity "for effect" is not effective in general, in my opinion.
> >I've worked with
Mark Twain once wrote something like "Cursing provides a release to the
soul denied even to prayer". In this spirit. profanity provides a level
of emotional release appropriate when stubbing your toe or knocking over
your 645 (Sorry, Paal). It can also be used deliberately to emphasize
a point o
It's one of the side effects of being on a list focussed on a target
that moves as fast as molasses in Siberia.
Dan Scott
LOL. This sentence explains much of what happens on this list.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
6 matches
Mail list logo
