Re: OT But vaguely related to the occupation thread

2007-01-03 Thread Cotty
On 3/1/07, Digital Image Studio, discombobulated, unleashed: >Warning child pictures follow: > >http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/thomas.html Well done mate - he's a keeper ;-) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.

Re: OT But vaguely related to the occupation thread

2007-01-03 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
> My current occupation is still very new to me, I had zero training and > no intentions of getting into this line of work but as we all know > life delivers these little challenges from time to time. To date I've > refrained from posting any kid pics to the list but I've just put > together a very

Re: OT But vaguely related to the occupation thread

2007-01-03 Thread DagT
Cute! (...and I'm sooo glad I'm finished with that phase. .-) DagT > Fra: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > My current occupation is still very new to me, I had zero training and > no intentions of getting into this line of work but as we all know > life delivers these little chal

Re: OT But vaguely related to the occupation thread

2007-01-02 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! > My current occupation is still very new to me, I had zero training and > no intentions of getting into this line of work but as we all know > life delivers these little challenges from time to time. To date I've > refrained from posting any kid pics to the list but I've just put > together a

Re: OT But vaguely related to the occupation thread

2007-01-02 Thread Bob Sullivan
Rob, Yes, that is mini-you! The match to your baby picture is amazing! I see your son is starting to think about things. This is a process that always amazed me. You can see them form the intention and then take the action! And are those his blocks and fort or your's. ;-) Plus the wise old man lo

Re: OT But vaguely related to the occupation thread

2007-01-02 Thread Doug Franklin
Digital Image Studio wrote: > I had [...] no intentions of getting into this line of work [...] Uh-huh. You got yourself into that mess. Don't look for sympathy from us! :-) -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.ne

Re: OT But vaguely related to the occupation thread

2007-01-02 Thread K.Takeshita
On 1/02/07 9:06 PM, "Digital Image Studio", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My current occupation is still very new to me, I had zero training and > no intentions of getting into this line of work but as we all know > life delivers these little challenges from time to time. To date I've > refrained f

Re: OT But vaguely related to the occupation thread

2007-01-02 Thread Paul Stenquist
Some great baby pics there, Rob. And what a sturdy looking little guy he is. Congratulations and good work. Many thousands of additional pics to follow. Been there done that, five times now (Counting Grace:-). Paul On Jan 2, 2007, at 9:06 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: > My current occupation

Re: OT But vaguely related to the occupation thread

2007-01-02 Thread David Savage
On 1/3/07, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My current occupation is still very new to me, I had zero training and > no intentions of getting into this line of work but as we all know > life delivers these little challenges from time to time. To date I've > refrained from posting a

OT But vaguely related to the occupation thread

2007-01-02 Thread Digital Image Studio
My current occupation is still very new to me, I had zero training and no intentions of getting into this line of work but as we all know life delivers these little challenges from time to time. To date I've refrained from posting any kid pics to the list but I've just put together a very Q&D page