Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really thatcomplicated)

2007-01-09 Thread John Coyle
lf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 2:27 PM Subject: Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really thatcomplicated) > Hey! We invented the dictionary. That insured that we had a standardized > way to

RE: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really thatcomplicated)

2007-01-09 Thread Bob W
'Closer to the original' doesn't mean anything. -- Bob > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Don Williams > Sent: 09 January 2007 20:27 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: OT Question

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really thatcomplicated)

2007-01-09 Thread Tom C
Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really >thatcomplicated) >Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:53:41 -0500 > >Neither Thru nor Nite is correct in any variation of English, I know of. > >Thibouille wrote: > > I think thos

Re: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really thatcomplicated)

2007-01-08 Thread Dario Bonazza
> Which way of spelling is correct? I suppose both, but one in U.S. English > and the other in U.K English etc? Almost. I'd say that spellings looking wrong are UK English, while all possible spelling variations (including the UK English ones, typos, cats walking on the keyboard, etc.) are US E

RE: OT Question (was Re: OT Is returning a phone message really thatcomplicated)

2007-01-08 Thread Bob W
> > moaning or apologising > > This is not to pick out Bob :-). > I am increasing seeing certain words spelt in a different way than (I > thought) I learned in school, and was thinking about asking > somebody about > it. Suddenly, I thought "why don't I ask here, the best > source of OT info"