Say WHAT? They do what they have to do to come up with what the
engineers and marketing have specified. Whatever they have to do to
get there is fair game.
I suggest that they are showing their keen expertise, by using all
tools/techniques at hand, to come up with meeting those
specifications.
You
Who changed this thread's Subject to "Option S?" keith w.
Steve Desjardins wrote:
>
> All of my Digtials use CF cards. What are SD memory card/MMC-removable
> media like?
>
> Steven Desjardins
> Department of Chemistry
> Washington and Lee University
> Lexington, VA 24450
> (540) 458-8873
> F
You are right Mike,
I thought for a moment that the original poster was telling me that an f/2.6
lens in a digital camera was equal to an f/1. lens in 35mm format.
On another note, I own a Dimage 7 but still get more enjoyment out of my 6x9
totally mechanical beasts. Photography hasn't been so m
> Focal length. f/l, not f/1. :)
The term "focal length," at least according to my standard references (_The
Focal Encyclopedia of Photography_ and _The ICP Encyclopedia of
Photography_), should not be abbreviated. Its symbol is (stylized or
italic f, in case it doesn't come through ascii) in
Thanks.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lawrence Kwan wrote:
>
> > Aperture range is f/2.6-4.8, which is from 35mm-105mm (35mm equivalent f/l.)
> > Quite a bit nicer than imagined, eh?
> > Speeds from 1 second to 1/2000 second. Nice too, eh?
>
> Is there manual exposure in Optio S? There is no "Metered Manual"
> mentioned in the Exp
Lawrence Kwan wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Mike Johnston wrote:
> > > Aperture range is f/2.6-4.8, which is from 35mm-105mm (35mm equivalent f/l.)
> >
> > A 35mm f/2.6 is not shabby at all for a lens that size. Pretty impressive,
>
> Actually, because of the diminishing CCD sensor size and t
Jeff wrote:
>
> Can you elaborate on the 35mm equivalent "f/1."?
>
> Jeff.
Sure. That was meant to be the shortcut way of expressing focal
length. "f/l." Eff slash ell. Not "f/1."
The lower case L looks mighty like a ONE, doesn't it?
Sorry about the confusion.
keith
> Paul Franklin Stregev
> Aperture range is f/2.6-4.8, which is from 35mm-105mm (35mm equivalent f/l.)
> Quite a bit nicer than imagined, eh?
> Speeds from 1 second to 1/2000 second. Nice too, eh?
Is there manual exposure in Optio S? There is no "Metered Manual"
mentioned in the Exposure mode. There is a "User" setting
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Mike Johnston wrote:
> > Aperture range is f/2.6-4.8, which is from 35mm-105mm (35mm equivalent f/l.)
>
> A 35mm f/2.6 is not shabby at all for a lens that size. Pretty impressive,
Actually, because of the diminishing CCD sensor size and the requirement
of only a small image c
Focal length. f/l, not f/1. :)
chris
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Jeff wrote:
> Can you elaborate on the 35mm equivalent "f/1."?
>
> Jeff.
>
> Paul Franklin Stregevsky wrote:
> > Big grin...
> > Aperture range is f/2.6-4.8, which is from 35mm-105mm (35mm equivalent f/l.)
> > Quite a bit nicer than i
Can you elaborate on the 35mm equivalent "f/1."?
Jeff.
Paul Franklin Stregevsky wrote:
Big grin...
Aperture range is f/2.6-4.8, which is from 35mm-105mm (35mm equivalent f/l.)
Quite a bit nicer than imagined, eh? Speeds from 1 second to 1/2000 second.
Nice too, eh?
Wow, Keith, was I wrong. Impr
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 18:35:21 -0800, Keith Whaley wrote:
>Pentax USA site says MSRP is going to be $425, and admit 'street
>price' will most likely be somewhat lower.
>Go To:
>http://www.pentax.com/products/cameras/camera_overview.cfm?productid=18263
Damn, Keith. Don't know how I missed it. Was al
Sure. What do you want first?
Pentax USA site says MSRP is going to be $425, and admit 'street
price' will most likely be somewhat lower.
Go To:
http://www.pentax.com/products/cameras/camera_overview.cfm?productid=18263
Fourth item down, on left hand panel, is "price list." Click on it.
keith
Big grin...
Aperture range is f/2.6-4.8, which is from 35mm-105mm (35mm equivalent f/l.)
Quite a bit nicer than imagined, eh?
Speeds from 1 second to 1/2000 second. Nice too, eh?
Lots of good things about it...
Keith Whaley
Paul Franklin Stregevsky wrote:
>
> Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:01:57 -0500, Paul Franklin Stregevsky wrote:
>Do those specs include maximum aperture? I didn't see this vital spec in the
>original article. That should be a red alert. I'll bet it's something like
>f/4.5 at "35mm" to f/6.7 at "105mm".
Where can you find "street" pricing
Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am I the _only_ PDMLer who is impressed with the little OptioS? Until now,
via Boz' post, I've not heard one person comment on this little jewel. Well,
other than a lot of palaver about how it will fit inside an Altoids box...
Granted, it's not out yet. Maybe
17 matches
Mail list logo
