Continuing my PAW catch-up ... another Panny LX1 image:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/48.htm
This one has potential in color too, the light is quite unusual.
Comments, critique, flames all appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
Ok i can see what your trying to do here.
I really like this one. Very ghost like.
Dave
> Continuing my PAW catch-up ... another Panny
LX1 image:
>
>http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/48.htm
>
> This one has potential in color too, the light
On 12/6/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Continuing my PAW catch-up ... another Panny LX1 image:
>
>http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/48.htm
>
> This one has potential in color too, the light is quite unusual.
> Comments, critique, flames all appreciated.
Love it!
I
Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Continuing my PAW catch-up ... another Panny LX1 image:
>
>http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/48.htm
Great one! Combines Theriaultean blur with an Annsan compositional style
(and great light). I'd probably burn in that light in the upper l
On 12/6/05, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Continuing my PAW catch-up ... another Panny LX1 image:
> >
> >http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/48.htm
>
> Great one! Combines Theriaultean blur with an Annsan compositional style
>
frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 12/6/05, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Continuing my PAW catch-up ... another Panny LX1 image:
>> >
>> >http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/48.htm
>>
>> Great one! Combines Ther
On 12/7/05, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well yeah, that pedestrian is tack sharp by your standards!
>
What's your point?
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
In a message dated 12/6/2005 10:17:17 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Continuing my PAW catch-up ... another Panny LX1 image:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/48.htm
This one has potential in color too, the light is quite unusual.
Comments, critique, flames all
Hi!
Hmmm. I think the setting had potential, but this one doesn't do much for me.
Also I am bothered by the big round thing on the right -- fact it is so close
to the man. Sorry.
Ditto. Your previous ghostly work was way better, at least to my eyes...
I have one major problem with this - the
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: PAW: People & Portraits #48 - GDG
>http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/48.htm
It doesn't look blurry to me!
This explains much.
William Robb
On 12/7/05, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ditto. Your previous ghostly work was way better, at least to my eyes...
>
> I have one major problem with this - the ghost is actually not that
> prominent... Unless I misunderstand you and you were not after that
> ghostly person...
>
I'll
11 matches
Mail list logo