nough traffic to
reach x . . .
stan
On Apr 25, 2011, at 12:43 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> I have not seen any new PDML digests since Saturday 23 April.
>
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
I have not seen any new PDML digests since Saturday 23 April.
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1209 / Virus Database: 1500/3596 - Release Date: 04/25/11
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
Me too!
Jack
--- On Thu, 12/17/09, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: John Sessoms
> Subject: PDML Digests
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Date: Thursday, December 17, 2009, 12:34 PM
> I subscribe through the digests. I've
> recently noticed responses to posts that I never saw the
&
I subscribe through the digests. I've recently noticed responses to
posts that I never saw the original in the digest.
I don't know if that represents gaps in my memory or if they're really
missing from the digests.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listin
://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2688014
Dan M
On 9/10/06, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I offer this about every year, but especially this year as it is
> the fifth anniversary. I have 9 PDML Digests from September the 11th and
> 12th, 2001. If you would like me to forwa
humane place to
live. Witness the bombings in London and Madrid.
Regards, Bob S.
On 9/10/06, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I offer this about every year, but especially this year as it is
> the fifth anniversary. I have 9 PDML Digests from September the 11th and
>
I think I offer this about every year, but especially this year as it is
the fifth anniversary. I have 9 PDML Digests from September the 11th and
12th, 2001. If you would like me to forward them, please contact me off list.
Meanwhile, my thoughts turn towards the solemn events of that day five
Hello,
i've gotten all digests since 2970, no duplicates.
25 from 48 digests since 2970 are 78kb in size
and seem to contain some virus. I don't think the
address is spoofed, because there are no duplicated
or missing digest numbers.
Martin Albrecht
Here is the header from 2970:
> Return-Path
Now that's just so much more information than I needed.
Cotty wrote:
On 25/11/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
and how tight your firewalls are.
I'm up three octaves but the ointment is working.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||==
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty"
Subject: PDML Digests -notice any virus activity?
I was contacted off list by a lurker who notes:
Never has happened before, but my "up-to-date" Norton Anti-Virus proggie
kicked out both numbers 2970 and 2973 of the PDML
say
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert"
Subject: Re: PDML Digests -notice any virus activity?
On 24 Nov 2005 at 14:41, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm a Mac user. I just run my computer and operating system. Never had
a problem.
I'm just W2K user, same compu
On 24 Nov 2005 at 22:11, Cotty wrote:
> On 25/11/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >and how tight your firewalls are.
>
> I'm up three octaves but the ointment is working.
good for you, I'm glad it's doing the trick ;-P
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC
On 25/11/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
>and how tight your firewalls are.
I'm up three octaves but the ointment is working.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 24 Nov 2005 at 14:41, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I'm a Mac user. I just run my computer and operating system. Never had
> a problem.
I'm just W2K user, same computer and OS, no nasty resource hogging AV tools
running. It all boils down to keeping OS and applications fresh with current
updates,
On 24/11/05, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Why the heck are you reading the digest, Cotty?
I'm not, Tom. Here's my original message:
I was contacted off list by a lurker who notes:
>Never has happened before, but my "up-to-date" Nor
Every other digest I've gotten today (and I've gotten a flood of them today)
has been tagged with the message below, and the contents have been deleted.
I'm running McAfee VirusScan v8.0.46, DAT version 4.0.4635 dated 11/23/05,
under Windows XP Home SP2 and Outlook 2000.
I 'spect one of y'all on t
.-)
The same here.
Also, I never leave an email address any place where it is
searchable. This works better than any program and I only get
something like one spam a week, and that is from this email address.
Try to search for you email address with Google, and if you find it
you ask th
I'm a Mac user. I just run my computer and operating system. Never had
a problem.
Paul
On Nov 24, 2005, at 2:33 PM, graywolf wrote:
Why the heck are you reading the digest, Cotty?
--GENERAL COMMENTS--
I have been remakably clean ever sence my last upgrade to XP Pro SP2
with the firewall set.
Why the heck are you reading the digest, Cotty?
--GENERAL COMMENTS--
I have been remakably clean ever sence my last upgrade to XP Pro SP2
with the firewall set. Of course I am also running AVG, AND AdsGone.
Also I periotically run Ad-Aware, Spyware, Xoftspy, and RegCleaner (old
version that
To: "pentax list"
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 2:56 PM
Subject: PDML Digests -notice any virus activity?
I was contacted off list by a lurker who notes:
Never has happened before, but my "up-to-date" Norton Anti-Virus
proggie
kicked out both numbers 2970 and 2973 of the P
Cotty wrote:
I was contacted off list by a lurker who notes:
Never has happened before, but my "up-to-date" Norton Anti-Virus proggie
kicked out both numbers 2970 and 2973 of the PDML
saying that a virus was found in each. 2971 and 2970 were accepted
properly as were all PDML's before these
I'm not in digest, but I received lots of spam with
suspicious attachs in the last hours...
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was contacted off list by a lurker who notes:
>
> >Never has happened before, but my "up-to-date"
> Norton Anti-Virus proggie
> >kicked out both numbers 2970 an
I didn't receive 2970, 2971 and 2973. I wonder if they were deleted by the
server for viruses?
> I was contacted off list by a lurker who notes:
>
> >Never has happened before, but my "up-to-date" Norton Anti-Virus proggie
> >kicked out both numbers 2970 and 2973 of the PDML
> >saying that a v
I was contacted off list by a lurker who notes:
>Never has happened before, but my "up-to-date" Norton Anti-Virus proggie
>kicked out both numbers 2970 and 2973 of the PDML
>saying that a virus was found in each. 2971 and 2970 were accepted
>properly as were all PDML's before these two numbers.
24 matches
Mail list logo
