On 3/2/2010 12:55 PM, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
frank theriaultknarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Misereremiser...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
I think now I know why Mark is losing his hair...
snip
Losing?
g,dr
I've been donating it to
I think now I know why Mark is losing his hair...
snip
Losing?
g,dr
I've been donating it to Cotty...
I won't tell you where I've been sticking it.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
2010/3/3 frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com:
Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency
Our *three* weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency...and
an almost fanatical devotion to Pentax
Our *four*...no... *Amongst* our weapons Amongst our
From: David J Brooks
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:52 PM, CheekyGeek cheekyg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, ?m...@robertstech.com wrote:
If we're a secret society devoted to photography, how could we call
ourselves anything but The Illuminati?
If we're going to abide by
2010/3/3 John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com:
If we're going to abide by the Truth in Advertising law, shouldn't we
at least spell it: Illuminaughty?
No one expects the illuminaughty
Delusion-naughty OTOH.
Delusinati sounds a lot more deceptive. :-)
Jostein
--
And thats why ad exec's were not allowed into the Python writers room.;-)
Dave
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:47 AM, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
in true advertising lingo it would read
Our more than one weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency
Our far more than two
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
But beyond that, the *quality* of what we received is way
up. You've all risen to the occasion, apparently.
I wouldn't have thought that was possible, but it's good news indeed!
Thanks again for your hard work.
--
PDML
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
. But beyond that, the *quality* of what we received is way
up. You've all risen to the occasion, apparently.
So, mine are out then.;-)
The submission period was extended a day, by the way, to give some
extra time for
David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
In other news, we also received submissions from someone who *isn't*
on the PDML and, as far as Doug can tell, never has been! He gets
several points for ambitiousness, but loses
Thank you Mark and also your fellow editors.
I was just poking around on your site trying to se the final list of
contributors. I saw it before when it popped up after I had done my
submissions, but I can't find a link now that would take me back there...
stan
On Mar 1, 2010, at 9:27 PM, Mark
message from Stan reads:
.
.Thank you Mark and also your fellow editors.
.
.I was just poking around on your site trying to se the final list of
contributors. I saw it before when it popped up after I had done my
submissions, but I can't find a link now that would take me back there...
.
.stan
Surely we'd be called The Asahi... :-)
--M.
On 02/03/2010, m...@robertstech.com m...@robertstech.com wrote:
David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
In other news, we also received submissions from someone who
Got it - thanks Luiz.
On Mar 2, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Luiz Felipe wrote:
message from Stan reads:
.
.Thank you Mark and also your fellow editors.
.
.I was just poking around on your site trying to se the final list of
contributors. I saw it before when it popped up after I had done my
m...@robertstech.com wrote:
David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
In other news, we also received submissions from someone who *isn't*
on the PDML and, as far as Doug can tell, never has been! He gets
On a more serious note, having just spent a whole weekend moving my
blog/website to its new theme, I have even more respect for the the
work Mark is putting in to this whole affair. Not only did he
implement the upload form, but he's also going to deal with all the
software pains of getting our
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
I think now I know why Mark is losing his hair...
snip
Losing?
g,dr
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
I think now I know why Mark is losing his hair...
snip
Losing?
g,dr
I've been donating it to Cotty...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
I think now I know why Mark is losing his hair...
We blame it on Doug.
Dave
Thanks, Mark!
--M.
--
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
On 1 March 2010 22:27, Mark Roberts
2010/3/2 David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com:
In other news, we also received submissions from someone who *isn't*
on the PDML and, as far as Doug can tell, never has been! He gets
several points for ambitiousness, but loses a lot more for treachery
;-) I suppose we should consider it a
2010/3/2 Miserere miser...@gmail.com:
On a more serious note, having just spent a whole weekend moving my
blog/website to its new theme, I have even more respect for the the
work Mark is putting in to this whole affair. Not only did he
implement the upload form, but he's also going to deal
So much for secret societies.;-) I have a name in mind, lets guess.
If we're a secret society devoted to photography, how could
we call ourselves anything but The Illuminati?
The Phalacrocorax Deceitful Masonic Lodge?
In Paradise Lost the cormorant is a symbol of deception,
Oh Hell, what did Milton Berl know anyway!
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
So much for secret societies.;-) I have a name in mind, lets guess.
If we're a secret society devoted to photography, how could
we call ourselves anything but The Illuminati?
The
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh Hell, what did Milton Berl know anyway!
Fashion statements.??
Dave
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
So much for secret societies.;-) I have a name in mind, lets guess.
If we're a
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
If we're a secret society devoted to photography, how could we call
ourselves anything but The Illuminati?
If we're going to abide by the Truth in Advertising law, shouldn't we
at least spell it: Illuminaughty?
Darren Addy
Kearney,
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:52 PM, CheekyGeek cheekyg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
If we're a secret society devoted to photography, how could we call
ourselves anything but The Illuminati?
If we're going to abide by the Truth in Advertising
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:17 PM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:52 PM, CheekyGeek cheekyg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
If we're a secret society devoted to photography, how could we call
ourselves anything
We've closed down the submissions page for the 2010 PSML book. We had
more participating photographers than last year and more total images
submitted. But beyond that, the *quality* of what we received is way
up. You've all risen to the occasion, apparently.
The submission period was extended a
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
We've closed down the submissions page for the 2010 PSML book. We had
more participating photographers than last year and more total images
submitted. But beyond that, the *quality* of what we received is way
up. You've
28 matches
Mail list logo
