On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just what we need. PDML soccer moms.
I put a pic of my kid in my .sig and now I can't send mail to the list.
What's going on?
Me, too!
Me, too!!!
AOL!
This forum sucks.
Me, to
You're going
John Celio wrote:
I think nice really hits the nail on the head with regards to this new
camera. It's going to be perfect for people who want simplicity and
nice photos.
Quite possibly.
There are still a couple of lines in the spec I don't like in that
respect, though:
Preview
Of course we know what you mean, but this is rather typical from
higher end bodies to habe loads of button for specific functions...
K10D/K20D or excellent examples of just that (even if they are not
perfect of course).
K-m/K2000 is targeted to a vastly different market however.
Condering only
Thibouille wrote:
Of course we know what you mean, but this is rather typical from
higher end bodies to habe loads of button for specific functions...
K10D/K20D or excellent examples of just that (even if they are not
perfect of course).
K-m/K2000 is targeted to a vastly different market
Pentax calls it small and kantan, kirei, omoshiroi, tanomoshii,
tanoshii and anshin. Simple, pretty, interesting, reliable, fun and
restful for the mind. Cute adjectives aside, I think you can safely
call it nice, at least in the words of Pentax.
If I am not all together wrong, it should
The body's actually a fair bit smaller than a DS. The K-m is the
smallest DSLR currently announced or available, being the same size or
smaller than a Oly E-420 in the two dimensions that matter (depth is
controlled by the mounted lens and so the E-420's smaller depth
measurement is irrelevant. A
I think nice really hits the nail on the head with regards to this new
camera. It's going to be perfect for people who want simplicity and
nice photos.
Despite all the grumbling from people who say Pentax needs a high-end
camera, this sort of thing is what Pentax REALLY needs: a small,
John,
I'd tend to agree, with the caveat that Pentax really needs BOTH the
flagship and the low-end model. The latter comes first, which is why
replacing the K100D Super with the K200D was a near-disaster for
Pentax since it removed them nearly completely from the low-end market
(due to both the
John Celio wrote:
Despite all the grumbling from people who say Pentax needs a high-end
camera, this sort of thing is what Pentax REALLY needs: a small,
affordable, entry-level camera with simple controls and features so that
Mrs. Soccer Mom can pick it up and photograph her kids.
Just what
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The body's actually a fair bit smaller than a DS. The K-m is the
smallest DSLR currently announced or available, being the same size or
smaller than a Oly E-420 in the two dimensions that matter (depth is
controlled by the
Scott Loveless wrote:
John Celio wrote:
Despite all the grumbling from people who say Pentax needs a high-end
camera, this sort of thing is what Pentax REALLY needs: a small,
affordable, entry-level camera with simple controls and features so that
Mrs. Soccer Mom can pick it up and photograph
Mark Roberts wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
John Celio wrote:
Despite all the grumbling from people who say Pentax needs a high-end
camera, this sort of thing is what Pentax REALLY needs: a small,
affordable, entry-level camera with simple controls and features so that
Mrs. Soccer
Despite all the grumbling from people who say Pentax needs a high-end
camera, this sort of thing is what Pentax REALLY needs: a small,
affordable, entry-level camera with simple controls and features so
that
Mrs. Soccer Mom can pick it up and photograph her kids.
It sounds as if you had
John: I absolutely love the portrait of the little girl with the pull toy.
Great one there. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S.: for the curious, here are some of my photos from the new Academy,
most shot with a D-FA 100 on my K10D:
14 matches
Mail list logo
