Thanks Marnie. She's very nice to the other little girls, so
hopefully they won't hate her :-).
Paul
On Oct 22, 2007, at 4:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 10/22/2007 7:48:01 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Thanks Frank. But that's not the pic:-).
In a message dated 10/22/2007 7:48:01 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks Frank. But that's not the pic:-). Grandpa had a senior moment and
posted the wrong URL. Here's the sandbox shot.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6553835
If I was a little
Thanks Bruce. The pop-up flash is sometimes useful.
Paul
On Oct 22, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Pretty good, really. You got a good angle on her and the light seems
> reasonably tamed. Good shot, there!
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Bruce
>
>
> Sunday, October 21, 2007, 6:43:19 PM, you
Pretty good, really. You got a good angle on her and the light seems
reasonably tamed. Good shot, there!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, October 21, 2007, 6:43:19 PM, you wrote:
PS> Wrong URL on this one. Should be:
PS> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6553835
PS> On Oct 21, 2007, at 9
That makes sense. Grandpa still in his Monday morning fog:-)
-- Original message --
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 10/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks Frank. But that's not the pic:-). Grandpa had a senior moment and
On 10/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Frank. But that's not the pic:-). Grandpa had a senior moment and
> posted the wrong URL. Here's the sandbox shot.
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6553835
>
That's the pic I was commenting on (even though I replied to yo
Thanks Frank. But that's not the pic:-). Grandpa had a senior moment and posted
the wrong URL. Here's the sandbox shot.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6553835
-- Original message --
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 10/21/07, Paul Stenquis
On 10/21/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had a tough time getting a pic of Grace in the sandbox. The
> light is almost always horrible when we're at the park, and it's hard
> for me to get low enough to get a nice angle. Today, I set the DA
> 16-45 at 16mm and held it just off
Thanks Bob. The hard backlight creates some blown highlights, but I
thought they worked here.
Paul
On Oct 21, 2007, at 9:57 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> I was looking for that picture Paul!
> The low perspective works really well.
> It becomes a very intimate portrait,
> and different from everythi
I was looking for that picture Paul!
The low perspective works really well.
It becomes a very intimate portrait,
and different from everything else you've shown us.
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/21/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wrong URL on this one. Should be:
> http://photo.net/photod
Wrong URL on this one. Should be:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6553835
On Oct 21, 2007, at 9:31 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I've had a tough time getting a pic of Grace in the sandbox. The
> light is almost always horrible when we're at the park, and it's hard
> for me to get low enough
I've had a tough time getting a pic of Grace in the sandbox. The
light is almost always horrible when we're at the park, and it's hard
for me to get low enough to get a nice angle. Today, I set the DA
16-45 at 16mm and held it just off the sand with the pop-up flash
turned on. f 5.6, 1/100t
12 matches
Mail list logo
