PESO: Sierra Ranch II

2006-07-17 Thread Jack Davis
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=133 __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pd

Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch II

2006-07-17 Thread Paul Stenquist
I like the composition. It appears to be very sharp and detailed, although it's hard to tell with such a small image. Pump it up! Paul On Jul 17, 2006, at 7:29 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > > > http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=133 > >

Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch II

2006-07-17 Thread Bruce Dayton
Hello Jack, I think I like it. I would like to see it a bit bigger. As it stands now, it seems a bit over sharpened to me -- Best regards, Bruce Monday, July 17, 2006, 4:29:06 PM, you wrote: JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=133 JD> ___

Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch II

2006-07-17 Thread Jack Davis
This is a moderately larger upload. I'm limited to 300K and if I pump it any further, pixels become a factor. I took this from my site as I have no back-up scan at this point. I see a restrained sharpening. Jack http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=135 --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL P

Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch II

2006-07-18 Thread Paul Stenquist
At 300K, you should be able to get far larger dimensions than what you've posted. Resolution above 72 dpi accomplishes nothing on the web. Size it for a substantial dimension, like 12 inches on the long side, at 72 dpi. Paul On Jul 17, 2006, at 11:27 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > This is a moderatel

Re: PESO: Sierra Ranch II

2006-07-18 Thread Jack Davis
At 72 dpi: http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID-136 Jack --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 300K, you should be able to get far larger dimensions than what > you've posted. Resolution above 72 dpi accomplishes nothing on the > web. > Size it for a substantial d