Lightroom
--
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Rebekah
> Sent: 27 August 2007 20:20
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: PESO: Texas
>
> I'd love to try that, but I'm only using Pica
"What's going on here, why the heck is everyone so agreeable all of a sudden?"
I agree.
rg2
On 8/27/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's going on here, why the heck is everyone so agreeable all of a sudden?
>
> Brian Walters wrote:
> > I agree with Frank.
> >
> >
> > Cheers
Aggg. Jumps out of tower window.
Rebekah wrote:
> "What's going on here, why the heck is everyone so agreeable all of a sudden?"
>
>
> I agree.
>
>
> rg2
>
> On 8/27/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> What's going on here, why the heck is everyone so agreeable all of a sudden
What's going on here, why the heck is everyone so agreeable all of a sudden?
Brian Walters wrote:
> I agree with Frank.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Brian
>
> ++
> Brian Walters
> Western Sydney, Australia
> http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
> http://www.pentaxphot
I agree with Frank.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/brianwalters
Quoting frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 8/27/07, cbwaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
I'm using Photoshop 7.0 it's the last version that runs on my OS of
choice, Win2k. I think there are a couple of less expensive
alternatives, but I haven't really gotten into them since I've been
using PS since version 4.0. Picture Window Pro is supposed to be very
good for less than $100 purch
- Original Message -
From: "Rebekah"
Subject: Re: PESO: Texas
> I'd love to try that, but I'm only using Picasa to play around with my
> photos - generally I just crop them and convert to B&W, so I haven't
> looked around much at photo editing pro
I'd love to try that, but I'm only using Picasa to play around with my
photos - generally I just crop them and convert to B&W, so I haven't
looked around much at photo editing programs. Any suggestions?
rg2
On 8/27/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A polarizing filter can work wonde
A polarizing filter can work wonders in situations like this, and works
for both color and B&W. It's the only filter I carry when shooting
digital. You might try bring out the clouds and strengthening the sky by
creating a second layer and erasing everything except the sky from that,
(it doesn'
> You might try fixing it in-camera next time. Use a polarizing filter or
> a graduated ND filter. (terminology? not too familiar with ND
> filters.) If you're shooting black and white, all you need is some sort
> of contrast filter. Reds are nice for bringing out clouds, but I find
> them hard
Rebekah wrote:
> On 8/27/07, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The first shot is better - both the flag and the overall composition.
>> I would try to rework it a bit to bring the sky out more - I can see
>> that there are some clouds that really want to be seen.
>>
>> --
>> Bruce
>
On 8/27/07, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first shot is better - both the flag and the overall composition.
> I would try to rework it a bit to bring the sky out more - I can see
> that there are some clouds that really want to be seen.
>
> --
> Bruce
>
Bruce -
You are completel
The first shot is better - both the flag and the overall composition.
I would try to rework it a bit to bring the sky out more - I can see
that there are some clouds that really want to be seen.
--
Bruce
Sunday, August 26, 2007, 9:59:03 PM, you wrote:
R> I've been sorting through my film lat
On 8/27/07, cbwaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with Brian.
I agree with Bob.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
The first one, definitely. The sweep of the foreground grass is more
pleasing to me.
Jack
--- Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been sorting through my film lately, and found a few pics I
> liked. Here's two taken of the same place, I can't decide which I
> like better.
>
>
http://picas
The first is a better composition to my eye.
Rebekah wrote:
> I've been sorting through my film lately, and found a few pics I
> liked. Here's two taken of the same place, I can't decide which I
> like better.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo?authkey=W1C-i05p28o#5103238749651775
I agree with Brian.
CW
Preseason football owns me.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 4:14 AM
Subject: Re: PESO: Texas
>I think I like the composition of the s
The first one with the flag visible through the trees is a much more
interesting composition. Nice work.
Paul
On Aug 27, 2007, at 12:59 AM, Rebekah wrote:
> I've been sorting through my film lately, and found a few pics I
> liked. Here's two taken of the same place, I can't decide which I
> lik
I think I like the composition of the second one better but the more prominent
flag and the sharp foreground grass makes me lean towards the first one.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Quoting R
the one with the flag flying properly. No contest.
--
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Rebekah
> Sent: 27 August 2007 05:59
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: PESO: Texas
>
> I've been s
I've been sorting through my film lately, and found a few pics I
liked. Here's two taken of the same place, I can't decide which I
like better.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo?authkey=W1C-i05p28o#5103238749651775042
I'm leaning towards the second one because it has more detail i
21 matches
Mail list logo
