ft I actually didn't save the speck version, and it's not on the print,
ft so I can't help you out, sadly. It was about the size of a grain of
ft sand. Not big at all.
Frank, you will surely be glad that I still have your first version
when you sent it to me offlist - remember?
See here:
See Peter, you could hardly notice it.
g
Dave S
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:57:25 +0100, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ft I actually didn't save the speck version, and it's not on the print,
ft so I can't help you out, sadly. It was about the size of a grain of
ft sand. Not big at all.
Frantisek wrote:
ft I actually didn't save the speck version, and it's not on the print,
ft so I can't help you out, sadly. It was about the size of a grain of
ft sand. Not big at all.
Frank, you will surely be glad that I still have your first version
when you sent it to me offlist - remember?
Frank, you will surely be glad that I still have your first version
when you sent it to me offlist - remember?
See here:
http://3web.dkm.cz/fotof/temp/dust.jpg
Holy moly, it's mutating!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Thursday, March 17, 2005, 10:55:53 AM, Cotty wrote:
Frank, you will surely be glad that I still have your first version
when you sent it to me offlist - remember?
See here:
http://3web.dkm.cz/fotof/temp/dust.jpg
C Holy moly, it's mutating!
Yes, somehow my harddrive got infected... you
That would both be nasty and very possible...
Tom C.
From: Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: Cotty pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: This Is Not a Blizzard
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:42:01 +0100
Thursday, March 17, 2005, 10:55:53 AM, Cotty wrote:
Frank
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:57:25 +0100, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank, you will surely be glad that I still have your first version
when you sent it to me offlist - remember?
See here:
http://3web.dkm.cz/fotof/temp/dust.jpg
grin, duck run
;-)
Good light!
fra
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:43:21 +0100, Peter Lacus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank,
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3173937size=lg
being still 10 days late and with about 2500 unread messages to go
probably everything was already said about this excellent picture. But
may I see
Frank,
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3173937size=lg
being still 10 days late and with about 2500 unread messages to go
probably everything was already said about this excellent picture. But
may I see also the original version (I mean a version with THE SPECK),
please? :-)
Bedo.
Hi,
I guess its really what one is used to - here in Sweden we also use headlights during
daytime. I really think its the headlights
with the woman that brings life into the picture. It really shows what its
like in bad weather with some occasional light source needed because its a
bit dark
frank theriault wrote on 3/6/2005, 10:51 AM:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3173937size=lg
Nice one frank. Really, nice one.
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 10:19:07 -0500, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice one frank. Really, nice one.
Well, thanks, Christian.
Since it looks like you're around the last to comment, I'll give a
great big thanks to everyone who commented. I know I've addressed a
couple of specific
I was going to save this for later in the week, and make it a PAW, but
we're supposed to get a couple more inches of snow today (but it might
turn to rain later in the afternoon - yuck!), so today seemed an
appropriate day to post this.
Taken a bit more than a month ago right smack in the middle
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 10:51:34 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was going to save this for later in the week, and make it a PAW, but
we're supposed to get a couple more inches of snow today (but it might
turn to rain later in the afternoon - yuck!), so today seemed an
appropriate
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:00:41 -0500, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like it. Good exposure. You've pretty much captured that classic
Leica BW feel. Too bad about the car on the other side of the street
with it's lights on, but I'm guessing you weren't going to stand out
there
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3173937size=lg
We always encourage comments, and thank you in advance should you
choose to do so.
cheers,
frank
Great shot Frank. You have captured a classic Canadian July afternoon.:-)
Nice contrast
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:29:14 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:00:41 -0500, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, no filter other than a UV. I really don't feel like paying
(what seem to me to be) exhorbitant prices on eBay for little teeny
39mm
You sure? Looks like one to me. It's a bit too contrasty, but
otherwise I like it. Nice composition.
frank theriault wrote:
I was going to save this for later in the week, and make it a PAW, but
we're supposed to get a couple more inches of snow today (but it might
turn to rain later in the
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 12:20:03 -0500, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
It's not the car itself. It's the headlights. For whatever reason,
not sure how to explain it, they just don't do it for me. The two
little bright spots tend to pull my eye away from the woman. Personal
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:49:55 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great shot Frank.
Thanks, Dave!
You have captured a classic Canadian July afternoon.:-)
Seems like it these days, eh? When the hell is this winter ever going
to end? g
Nice contrast and exposure. The lady
Nice one Frank.
I like the way the buildings fade in to the murky weather, really adds
a sense of depth the fact that the street is so empty, save this on
hearty soul. I also like the way she's struggling to keep her hood
down.
One tiny little thing. About an inch from the top, just right of
Hi,
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3173937size=lg
We always encourage comments, and thank you in advance should you
choose to do so.
Very good!
--
Cheers,
Bob
Oh yes!
I was just about to ask you to clean your monitor screen when I spotted it.
Just above that pole that holds the Don't DO This signs...
Yes, it is a tiny thing, and only visible when you know it's there, and
an artifact.
The sort of thing that now I know it's there, I can never look at
It's not a blizzard as
the average windspeed was only 40 km/h (about 25 mph), although gusts
were much higher. Environment Canada's definition of a blizzard is
snow with average winds of over 50 km/h (30mph).
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3173937size=lg
Makes me shiver looking at
Excellent shot. Nice composition. Very dramatic. Bravo!
Paul
On Mar 6, 2005, at 1:14 PM, Powell Hargrave wrote:
It's not a blizzard as
the average windspeed was only 40 km/h (about 25 mph), although gusts
were much higher. Environment Canada's definition of a blizzard is
snow with average winds
Hello frank,
Nice job! You really portrayed the feeling of the storm. I like the
framing of the women in the lower right. Impressive.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, March 6, 2005, 7:51:34 AM, you wrote:
ft I was going to save this for later in the week, and make it a PAW, but
ft we're
Hi,
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3173937size=lg
We always encourage comments, and thank you in advance should you
choose to do so.
One more comment - not a criticism, because I like the picture, but
something I try to look out for when I take photos. The big 'For
Lease' sign.
On 6/3/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
I was going to save this for later in the week, and make it a PAW, but
we're supposed to get a couple more inches of snow today (but it might
turn to rain later in the afternoon - yuck!), so today seemed an
appropriate day to post this.
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 01:41:44 +0800, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice one Frank.
I like the way the buildings fade in to the murky weather, really adds
a sense of depth the fact that the street is so empty, save this on
hearty soul. I also like the way she's struggling to keep her
On 6/3/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
One tiny little thing. About an inch from the top, just right of
centre, there's a black speck that keeps grabbing my attention, it's
gotta go :-)
Oh My God! A tiny thing? A TINY THING?
No, David, I want to apologize humbly, deeply
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:01:11 +, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more comment - not a criticism, because I like the picture, but
something I try to look out for when I take photos. The big 'For
Lease' sign. It's probably the whitest thing in the frame, and so it
tends to pull the eye
On 6/3/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sigh...
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3175020size=lg
There. Satisfied?
LOL!!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 6/3/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sigh...
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3175020size=lg
There. Satisfied?
Hey buddy while you're at it, I hate the number 195 - any chance you
could maybe make it 159? And what about that no parking sign, how about
swapping
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:01:11 +, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more comment - not a criticism, because I like the picture, but
something I try to look out for when I take photos. The big 'For
Lease' sign. It's probably the whitest thing in the frame, and so it
tends to pull the eye
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 17:31:36 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:01:11 +, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
2) That photo, wonderful and full of impact as it is, is not what it
appears. It's actually a relief line for flood victims in, IIRC,
Missouri or
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 22:16:01 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I rather liked it. Can I have copy of just the speck?
Go away, Cotty!
LOL
cheers,
frank
ps: I was actually tempted for a brief second to blow up that speck
REAL big and post it. But I didn't. g
--
Sharpness is a
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 22:24:58 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey buddy while you're at it, I hate the number 195 - any chance you
could maybe make it 159? And what about that no parking sign, how about
swapping them around, maybe try twisting the top one around a bit to
match the
On 6/3/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
I believe I've already told you...
Now Frank, you *know* I don't take no for an answer.
Free The Speck, Free The Speck, Free The Speck.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Hi,
Sunday, March 6, 2005, 10:17:00 PM, frank wrote:
So I do my best to choose a vantage point that avoids intrusive text
because I know that if the text gets in the frame, people will read it
rather than look at the real subject.
Sigh...
LOL
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 17:09:12 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh My God! A tiny thing? A TINY THING?
Yes, a tiny thing :-)
Great composition, nicley exposed, its even in focus, I had to comment
on somthing. g
No, David, I want to apologize humbly, deeply and sincerely
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 10:59:14 +0800, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Your are a kind, fine person [for calling it a speck], but I can
see it... To me it's like a mountain, a vast bowl of pus!
Thanks for that revolting visual image :-)
snip
Dave,
Just so you know, I stole it
Hi!
Taken a bit more than a month ago right smack in the middle of the
central shopping district at noon on a Saturday. Normally, the place
would be jammed with cars and pedestrians. It's not a blizzard as
the average windspeed was only 40 km/h (about 25 mph), although gusts
were much higher.
42 matches
Mail list logo
