In a message dated 7/8/2006 9:31:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have a twinge of guilt about this image, also.
Any idea why? (assuming you feel like playing)
All comments appreciated.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=123
=
Actually, I like
Kodak did that, Marnie. :) I divulged the process in a post last
evening.
While reviewing some color negative poppy shots, this image stuck with
me. I ultimately mounted the frame in a slide mount and took it to a
lab and had a reverse Fujichrome print done.
Complete accident, but has been a
Jack Davis wrote:
Okay, so you'll get some sleep tonight, I'll tell you this is a
positive print of a color negative.
Cool. So this is actually a photo of a red flower.
This is just the kind of flower shot I like: So close up that it
becomes a study in form, shape, texture and light, rather
Mark,
To show a version of the color, I'm attaching a shot of the actual
Poppy used for the shot. Both taken on Ektar 100 with an M 50mm f/1.4
and close-up filter. (forget which #)
Appreciate comments.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=125
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL
In a message dated 7/9/2006 9:21:48 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mark,
To show a version of the color, I'm attaching a shot of the actual
Poppy used for the shot. Both taken on Ektar 100 with an M 50mm f/1.4
and close-up filter. (forget which #)
Appreciate comments.
Jack
On Jul 9, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Mark,
To show a version of the color, I'm attaching a shot of the actual
Poppy used for the shot. Both taken on Ektar 100 with an M 50mm f/1.4
and close-up filter. (forget which #)
Appreciate comments.
Jack
Thanks, wish I could take credit for the idea.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/9/2006 9:21:48 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mark,
To show a version of the color, I'm attaching a shot of the actual
Poppy used for the shot. Both taken on Ektar
That, of course, would take me a couple seconds, so, of course, it
never gets done. ;)
Jack
--- Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 9, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Mark,
To show a version of the color, I'm attaching a shot of the actual
Poppy used for the shot. Both
Have a twinge of guilt about this image, also.
Any idea why? (assuming you feel like playing)
All comments appreciated.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=123
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
] On
Behalf Of Jack Davis
Sent: 08 July 2006 17:25
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Tricked Up Poppy
Have a twinge of guilt about this image, also.
Any idea why? (assuming you feel like playing)
All comments appreciated.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=123
--
PDML
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Davis
Sent: 08 July 2006 17:25
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Tricked Up Poppy
Have a twinge of guilt about this image, also.
Any idea why? (assuming you feel like playing)
All comments appreciated.
Jack
Okay, so you'll get some sleep tonight, I'll tell you this is a
positive print of a color negative.
I clicked on the wrong subject in my first attempt to reveal the
answer. Guess it was due to me excitement.
Jack
--- Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have a twinge of guilt about this image,
12 matches
Mail list logo
