n Guthrie
Sent: February 20, 2012 2/20/12
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: re: PESO - Progress
Yes Frank I remember you saying you were posting something in this vein.
Great photo - moody and well framed with the expanse of water setting
the scale. What time of day did you take this?
> Message: 10
&
List
Subject: PESO - Progress
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
This scene reminded me of the 50's, when smoking factories were a
symbols of progress and prosperity:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2012/02/progress.html
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
c
Great shot.
Dave
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:06 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> This scene reminded me of the 50's, when smoking factories were a
> symbols of progress and prosperity:
>
> http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2012/02/progress.html
>
> Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
>
> cheers,
> fra
Tonal range is perfect.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Lighting and composition exceptionally nice,
>
> Jack
>
>
>
> From: frank theriault
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 2:06 PM
Lighting and composition exceptionally nice,
Jack
From: frank theriault
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 2:06 PM
Subject: PESO - Progress
This scene reminded me of the 50's, when smoking factories were a
symbols of progres
Wow, I haven't seen a line of smoking stacks like that in years! (The
sugar mill on Maui seems to be down to one active stack these days.)
That is an effective image, Frank.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:06 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
>
terrific shot, Frank
ann
On 2/19/2012 17:06, frank theriault wrote:
This scene reminded me of the 50's, when smoking factories were a
symbols of progress and prosperity:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2012/02/progress.html
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
PDML Penta
Great light. A very nice pic.
Paul
On Feb 19, 2012, at 5:06 PM, frank theriault wrote:
> This scene reminded me of the 50's, when smoking factories were a
> symbols of progress and prosperity:
>
> http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2012/02/progress.html
>
> Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
>
On 19/2/12, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
>This scene reminded me of the 50's, when smoking factories were a
>symbols of progress and prosperity:
>
>http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2012/02/progress.html
>
>Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
Frank, that's a very special photograp
This scene reminded me of the 50's, when smoking factories were a
symbols of progress and prosperity:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2012/02/progress.html
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discus
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Bob W wrote:
>>
>> > Nah. Should have changed it to 'used condom'.
>>
>> Funny you should mention that. That location is less than a block
>> from Church and Wellesley Streets here in Toronto. It's not unusual
>> to find used condoms on the ground in that neighbou
>
> > Nah. Should have changed it to 'used condom'.
>
> Funny you should mention that. That location is less than a block
> from Church and Wellesley Streets here in Toronto. It's not unusual
> to find used condoms on the ground in that neighbourhood. Not that I
> was looking, but fortunately
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Bob W wrote:
> Nah. Should have changed it to 'used condom'.
Funny you should mention that. That location is less than a block
from Church and Wellesley Streets here in Toronto. It's not unusual
to find used condoms on the ground in that neighbourhood. Not tha
> Just what every neighbourhood needs:
>
> http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2009/04/progress.html
>
> Comments always welcome.
>
> cheers,
> frank
>
> ==
> LOL. Good one, frank. Some graffiti genius was right on.
>
> Marnie aka Doe :-)
Nah. Should have changed it to 'used c
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:10 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> That would be a good one for Marnie's paranoid theme.:-)
I was thinking that, too!
Thanks for the comment. Thanks to Marnie and Bruce, too.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Dis
That would be a good one for Marnie's paranoid theme.:-)
Dave
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:28 AM, frank theriault
wrote:
> Just what every neighbourhood needs:
>
> http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2009/04/progress.html
>
> Comments always welcome.
>
> cheers,
> frank
>
>
> --
> "Sharpness is a bo
Gave me a chuckle. Even wider may have worked to show the
surroundings.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, April 1, 2009, 7:28:44 AM, you wrote:
ft> Just what every neighbourhood needs:
ft> http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2009/04/progress.html
ft> Comments always welcome.
ft> cheers,
ft> frank
--
In a message dated 4/1/2009 8:48:50 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
knarftheria...@gmail.com writes:
Just what every neighbourhood needs:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2009/04/progress.html
Comments always welcome.
cheers,
frank
==
LOL. Good one, frank. Some graffiti genius wa
Just what every neighbourhood needs:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2009/04/progress.html
Comments always welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika
wrote:
> a little tribute to rodchenko.
>
> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3578/3377240694_520c19884c_o.jpg
>
> pentax k10d fa 50 1.4
Very interesting!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML
Very nice work Luka. Usually I don't like image manipulation, but I can
understand what you meant.
Best regards,
Manuel
On 09/03/22 22:04, "Luka Knezevic-Strika" wrote:
> a little tribute to rodchenko.
>
> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3578/3377240694_520c19884c_o.jpg
>
> pentax k10d fa 50
Cool shot.
Dave
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika
wrote:
> a little tribute to rodchenko.
>
> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3578/3377240694_520c19884c_o.jpg
>
> pentax k10d fa 50 1.4
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pd
> Wow. I'm truly honored to hear my work cast in such a light.
> Thank you
> all.
>
> I have looked around at Rodchenko briefly. I knew the name but have
> not seen his work in depth. I'll have study him some more.
> Inspiration
> can come from many places... ! :-)
>
> Godfrey
This is t
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:50:06AM +0100, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
> something went wrong with the link. this should work
>
> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3434/3377247097_be1c72269f_o.jpg
Very fun.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pd
Wow. I'm truly honored to hear my work cast in such a light. Thank you
all.
I have looked around at Rodchenko briefly. I knew the name but have
not seen his work in depth. I'll have study him some more. Inspiration
can come from many places... ! :-)
Godfrey
On Mar 22, 2009, at 6:08 PM, B
In a message dated 3/22/2009 7:50:19 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
lukastr...@gmail.com writes:
something went wrong with the link. this should work
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3434/3377247097_be1c72269f_o.jpg
===
That's much better. And much more interesting.
Marnie aka Doe :
something went wrong with the link. this should work
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3434/3377247097_be1c72269f_o.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the dir
and here's another one - quite different, but i think i've made enough
new topics these days:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3450/3377209407_babf34ea71_o.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
I'm glad someone was able to untangle my reference to PDML manual as
meaning ANNUAL. Thanks Bob.
On Mar 22, 2009, at 18:08 , Bob W wrote:
Ascent Beginning, by Godfrey.
Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com
http://gallery.me.com/jomac
http://web.me.com/jomac/show.me/Blog/Blog.html
--
PDM
Ascent Beginning, by Godfrey.
It reminds me more of one of HCB's pictures, also shot from above. Of
course, HCB was probably well aware of Rodchenko's style. On the other hand,
he didn't much approve of photos taken from strange angles and viewpoints,
as Rodchenko often did. Rodchenko was opposed
But one of the most acclaimed shot in the PDML manual was shot ala
Rodchenko, the view looking down at the plaza with the mother and
stroller, and the child running down the steps (my sis has the book,
so can't research the photographer). That was a good image in my
opinion.
On Mar 22, 2
yes, an excellent series. a french produced 'contacts' is also
findable online, even better IMHO.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
> Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
>>
>> i was actuall hoping that someone would be provoked to find out who
>> the guy is by going to google image sear
Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
i was actuall hoping that someone would be provoked to find out who
the guy is by going to google image search and typing rodchenko.
of course, you don't like this, so you can be not-interested in
whatever inspired it.
There was a good bit of info on Rodchenko in "Th
ah, yes. seems much better - it's black and white :D
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
That's what I did...
Found this... http://www.softpedia.com/screenshots/Rodchenko_1.png
On Mar 22, 2009, at 15:47 , Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
i was actuall hoping that someone would be provoked to find out who
the guy is by going to google image search and typing rodchenko.
Joseph McAll
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 06:59:19PM -0500, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Luka,
> This guy was a famous artist during the russian revolution.
> Not a great time in my mind for creative, artistic expression.
> Didn't they do the russian revolution in monochrome?
The Black and White Russians?
czary
--
The
in my view, an hommage needn't be the same as what the author did. it
needs to pay respect, somehow.
and well, the times that are bad for artistic expression tend to
produce prodigies, much more so than the peaceful, calm times. you can
explain it to your liking, but it's there.
--
PDML Pentax-Dis
I keep Boz, Google and Wikipedia on hand whenever I'm reading this
list. I try to no longer get caught by my imperfect memory or
education. The PDMLrs are cutthroat when you misspeak
(miscommunicate). Spell check everything too, 90% of the time.
Jpself
I said 90%
On Mar 22, 2009, at 15:42
Luka,
This guy was a famous artist during the russian revolution.
Not a great time in my mind for creative, artistic expression.
Didn't they do the russian revolution in monochrome?
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika
wrote:
> well, it's kind of pointless giving
On 22/3/09, eactiv...@aol.com, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I don't mind manipulated images, but this one doesn't cut it for me,
because
>the nearest ones are too small.
Bless her, she's from California you know ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=
FTR, I don't care for Rodchenko's photo style either, Luka.
Jack
--- On Sun, 3/22/09, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
> From: Luka Knezevic-Strika
> Subject: Re: PESO: progress
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Sunday, March 22, 2009, 3:38 PM
> i know
the connection is not very direct. but the whole movement tended to
use collages often resulting in surreal atmosphere - sometimes
photograph-like, sometimes less-so. it's not like a copy of one of his
work, more of a general hommage to the guy (and probably not only him,
but he provoked me)
@eact
In a message dated 3/22/2009 3:47:41 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
lukastr...@gmail.com writes:
i was actuall hoping that someone would be provoked to find out who
the guy is by going to google image search and typing rodchenko.
of course, you don't like this, so you can be not-interested in
wha
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 03:38:57PM -0700, Joseph McAllister wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2009, at 15:28 , eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
> This image is a tribute to how the perpective of converging lines
> appears to alter the size of any object located between them. Each
> image of he woman is the same siz
i was actuall hoping that someone would be provoked to find out who
the guy is by going to google image search and typing rodchenko.
of course, you don't like this, so you can be not-interested in
whatever inspired it.
but giving opinions about a 'tribute to x' without any concern about x
is point
Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
a little tribute to rodchenko.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3578/3377240694_520c19884c_o.jpg
Very cool!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly abo
In a message dated 3/22/2009 3:39:46 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
pentax...@mac.com writes:
This image is a tribute to how the perpective of converging lines
appears to alter the size of any object located between them. Each
image of he woman is the same size. Measure them...
Aleksander Mi
On Mar 22, 2009, at 15:28 , eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 3/22/2009 3:25:56 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
lukastr...@gmail.com writes:
if she was increasing in size, according to perspective, it would all
be dull, pseudo-realistic, and therefore completely pointless. my
version mi
i know who magritte is. and that is beside the point. the image was
sent here as a tribute to rodchenko. and it's why it was made (i was
looking at his work today). of course, you can view any photo beside
the author's point of view, but disregarding how the author caps it,
because of not knowing w
In a message dated 3/22/2009 3:30:40 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
lukastr...@gmail.com writes:
well, it's kind of pointless giving a comment on a tribute, suggesting
a crucial change to the image, without even checking-out who is the
tribute to.
and rodchenko is a very important photographer, b
my pleasure :)
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Now that's just plain funny as heck. Thank you, Luka! :-)
>
> G
>
> On Mar 22, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
>
>> a little tribute to rodchenko.
>>
>> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3578/3377240694_520c198
Now that's just plain funny as heck. Thank you, Luka! :-)
G
On Mar 22, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
a little tribute to rodchenko.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3578/3377240694_520c19884c_o.jpg
pentax k10d fa 50 1.4
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://p
well, it's kind of pointless giving a comment on a tribute, suggesting
a crucial change to the image, without even checking-out who is the
tribute to.
and rodchenko is a very important photographer, btw, not some half-known guy.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:28 PM, wrote:
> In a message dated 3/22/
In a message dated 3/22/2009 3:25:56 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
lukastr...@gmail.com writes:
if she was increasing in size, according to perspective, it would all
be dull, pseudo-realistic, and therefore completely pointless. my
version might be unsuccessful, but it has an intention and a mot
No no no :) I really like it because the perspective and the size of the
cloned person doesn't match. It really gives something wicked to the
picture... at least to me :)
Cheers,
.t
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 3/22/2009 3:04:34 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
lukastr...@gmail.com
if she was increasing in size, according to perspective, it would all
be dull, pseudo-realistic, and therefore completely pointless. my
version might be unsuccessful, but it has an intention and a motive
for being this way perspective-size-wise
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:20 PM, wrote:
> In a mes
In a message dated 3/22/2009 3:04:34 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
lukastr...@gmail.com writes:
a little tribute to rodchenko.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3578/3377240694_520c19884c_o.jpg
pentax k10d fa 50 1.4
I don't mind manipulated images, but this one doesn't cut it for me
On Mar 22, 2009, at 15:04 , Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
a little tribute to rodchenko.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3578/3377240694_520c19884c_o.jpg
Clever - Cute. A standard for all grade schools!
Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com
http://gallery.me.com/jomac
http://web.me.com/jomac/sh
a little tribute to rodchenko.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3578/3377240694_520c19884c_o.jpg
pentax k10d fa 50 1.4
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the di
59 matches
Mail list logo
