On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:08:51 +0100, John Whittingham wrote:
> Aren't all the shorter ones (8mm) circular fisheyes as opposed to diagonal?
As far as I know. That's what makes it harder to get a "normal
looking" photo from them. You have to crop out a _tiny_ portion of the
center of the shot. :-)
Aren't all the shorter ones (8mm) circular fisheyes as opposed to diagonal?
John
-- Original Message ---
From: "Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:14:23 -0400
Subj
Just wanted to throw in that it's easier to mask the "fisheye-ness" of
longer focal length fisheyes than shorter focal length ones. That is,
it'll be easier to take a "normal looking" shot with a 16mm FE than an
8mm FE.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:48:23 -0400, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was going to post this anyway, careful subject choice will minimize
> how noticeable the fisheye effect is.
> Here's an example which I think does just that.
>
> http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_hidden_wa
I was going to post this anyway, careful subject choice will minimize
how noticeable the fisheye effect is.
Here's an example which I think does just that.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_hidden_waterfall.html
(If others don't think that well they can just complain as usual :-P ).
Da
5 matches
Mail list logo
