Based on comments by the list, I thought I would try a few more things
and show you what I had to work with. The story I told is basically
how the shot came to be - whether you agree with my thought process or
not, that is why I took the shot. The issue I had was harsher
lighting than I wanted -
#3, but with a grade higher contrast! If this were on film in B&W, I would
have printed it on Agfa Brovira 6 :-)
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I like it as shot. I also like alternates two and three.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Based on comments by the list, I thought I would try a few more things
> and show you what I had to work with. The story I told is basicall
Bruce,
I think it's best in black and white - #3.
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/25/07, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on comments by the list, I thought I would try a few more things
> and show you what I had to work with. The story I told is basically
> how the shot came to be - whether
On 4/25/07, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce,
> I think it's best in black and white - #3.
> Regards, Bob S.
>
I agree.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/
I second that.
I think #3 gets your idea cross better than the original image you
displayed.
Tom C.
>From: "Bob Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Bruce,
>I think it's best in black and white - #3.
>Regards, Bob S.
>
>On 4/25/07, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Based on comments by t
Much prefer the original image, Bruce. It has a stirring airy sweep to
it that is quite nice.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on comments by the list, I thought I would try a few more
> things
> and show you what I had to work with. The story I told is basically
> how th
I like alternative 3 best.
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on comments by the list, I thought I would try
> a few more things
> and show you what I had to work with. The story I
> told is basically
> how the shot came to be - whether you agree with my
> thought process
In a message dated 4/25/2007 2:02:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Based on comments by the list, I thought I would try a few more things
and show you what I had to work with. The story I told is basically
how the shot came to be - whether you agree with my thought pro
Bruce, I did these in about 10 minutes. I had 10 minutes to spare. :-)
I will take them down once I know you have seen them.
Some people are going to tell you to go with a straight B&W conversion. But
in this case, I think you are right, it needs to be punched up.
http://members.aol.com/ea
Marnie,
Try 2 is great.
Rick
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Bruce, I did these in about 10 minutes. I had 10
> minutes to spare. :-)
>
> I will take them down once I know you have seen
> them.
>
> Some people are going to tell you to go with a
> straight B&W conversion. But
> in this cas
The original, as shot gets my vote.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - End Part II
> Based on comments by the list, I thought I would try a few more things
> and show you what I had to work with. The sto
The original and Alternative #3 (b&w) are the best. You see, Bruce, to
my eye what became of the ocean on the original image you presented did
not come across like water. I thought it was a bit more soil, just
without any vegetation on it.
Actually, I think that the original shot with just a bi
In a message dated 4/25/2007 6:31:46 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie,
Try 2 is great.
Rick
=
Thanks.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored.
**
14 matches
Mail list logo
