Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12254
So far I've been severely criticized for lack of sharpness on the
foreground... I wonder what you have to say re this and re the image in
general.
Be brutal and honest.
Thanks.
Boris
Well, the composition is OK... Regards, Bob S.
On 3/4/06, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12254
>
> So far I've been severely criticized for lack of sharpness on the
> foreground... I wonder what you have to say re this and re the image
Boris,
In case you weren't aware, the foreground is somewhat soft.
If that 'thing' laying against or on the barrel were not there, the
little cleaner image might be a slight improvement.
Trying to be positive.
Jack
--- Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> http://not.contaxg.co
Reminds me of my image in this months PUG - Patterns.
Be brutal and honest.
I like the idea & subject.
Something's amiss with the sharpness, especially the foreground.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subjec
Boris,
Nothing appears sharp in this photo. I thought it had been made using one
of your soft lenses, and was quite surprised to see it was the 77mm that
was used.
The photo itself does nothing for me ...
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Boris Liberman
> http://not.contaxg.com/document.p
I like the shot. Looking at a web image without my glasses, it's
difficult for me to tell if the immediate foreground is sharp. However,
I agree that it should be in a photo of this sort. Idealy, this is
something you'd shoot at f22 and make it all as sharp as possible. Or,
open up to about f4
After reading Shel's comment, I had to go get my glasses and look at
this again. I have to agree with his comment. I couldn't find a focal
point. Perhaps there was some camera shake. However, I do like the
concept and the composition.
Paul
On Mar 4, 2006, at 3:32 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Bor
Hello Boris,
For me, it's not so much the foreground, but the whole image seems
unsharp. I'm not quite sure why - camera shake or focus past the
range of the picture or something? Also for composition, I think the
barrel just a touch lower in the image would be stronger (that could
also be done
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: PESO - Land, under the Sun
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12254
So far I've been severely criticized for lack of sharpness on the
foreground... I wonder what you have to say re this and re the im
On 3/6/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> Wrom: RHDMNNSKVFVWRKJV
> Subject: PESO - Land, under the Sun
>
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12254
> >
> > So far I&#x
- Original Message -
From: "David Savage"
Subject: Re: PESO - Land, under the Sun
Being relatively new to the list, wasn't that stretching the PUG entry
rules a bit? :-)
I may have been trying to make a point about something or other...
William Robb
Hi!
Nothing appears sharp in this photo. I thought it had been made using one
of your soft lenses, and was quite surprised to see it was the 77mm that
was used.
Thanks everyone who commented.
This is very strange, because when I was preparing the image I did not
notice the lack of sharpness
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12254
So far I've been severely criticized for lack of sharpness on the
foreground... I wonder what you have to say re this and re the image in
general.
Be brutal and honest.
Just catching up with PESOs after sifting throug
er of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 7. mars 2006 15:55
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: PESO - Land, under the Sun
>
> Bo
14 matches
Mail list logo
