So do I!
Just thought it was fun to play with.
Rick
> On Feb 12, 2018, at 8:55 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> agree with Paul
>
> ann
>
> On 2/12/2018 1:35 AM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
>> That one's nice, too, but I like the first the best.
>>
>> -p
>>
>>
>> On 2/11/2018 9:36 PM, Rick Womer wro
agree with Paul
ann
On 2/12/2018 1:35 AM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
That one's nice, too, but I like the first the best.
-p
On 2/11/2018 9:36 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
The same as the previous photo, inverted for fun:
https://www.photo.net/photo/18456655/Looking-Up-side-down
Comments?
Rick
That one's nice, too, but I like the first the best.
-p
On 2/11/2018 9:36 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
The same as the previous photo, inverted for fun:
https://www.photo.net/photo/18456655/Looking-Up-side-down
Comments?
Rick
--
Paul Sorenson
Studio1941
Sooner or later "different" scares peopl
I like this! Cool interpretation of the MAM. Sorry that I wasn't able
to join you.
-p
On 2/11/2018 3:48 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
From our trip to Milwaukee in October, taken at the Museum of Art:
https://www.photo.net/photo/18456602/Looking-Up
(K-5, DA 17-70)
Comments appreciated!
Rick
Excellent!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
> From our trip to Milwaukee in October, taken at the Museum of Art:
>
> https://www.photo.net/photo/18456602/Looking-Up
>
> (K-5, DA 17-70)
>
> Comments appreciated!
>
>
The same as the previous photo, inverted for fun:
https://www.photo.net/photo/18456655/Looking-Up-side-down
Comments?
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
>From our trip to Milwaukee in October, taken at the Museum of Art:
https://www.photo.net/photo/18456602/Looking-Up
(K-5, DA 17-70)
Comments appreciated!
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visi
: "Darren Addy"
Subject: Re: Peso Looking up-looking down
Another point of failure? Sure, sort of like electric windows, air
conditioning and other options on cars. On balance, it should be up to
the consumer whether he wishes to have them or not. Sales figures
would determine whet
On 30/07/2013 10:40 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
Another point of failure? Sure, sort of like electric windows, air
conditioning and other options on cars. On balance, it should be up to
the consumer whether he wishes to have them or not. Sales figures
would determine whether it was worthwhile for a co
hehe - hope she can get up!
ann
On 7/30/2013 11:16, David J Brooks wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17480450
The photographer is lying on the ground looking up i assume to try and
get all of the CN Tower in the back ground.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It is, you can always get a Nikon D5100. Pentax chooses not to have
that point of failure.
Just yesterday I was walking out of a local dry goods emporium when I
was almost bowled over by an unhappy customer Kuerig coffee maker
clutched to their breast, with murder in their eye, on the way to
EDIT: "or now" should be "or not".
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
> Another point of failure? Sure, sort of like electric windows, air
> conditioning and other options on cars. On balance, it should be up to
> the consumer whether he wishes to have them or not. Sales figures
Another point of failure? Sure, sort of like electric windows, air
conditioning and other options on cars. On balance, it should be up to
the consumer whether he wishes to have them or not. Sales figures
would determine whether it was worthwhile for a company to offer the
option or now. It would c
THIS is the reason for articulating LCD screens. I think that if
camera companies are going to make duplicate models except for the
anti-alias filter then they could also make duplicate models
with/without an articulating LCD screen.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
> http:
Well, convenient as articulating screens are, they just add another
point of failure to an already complex device. I can understand why a
manufacturer would forgo making models with this feature.
On 7/30/2013 12:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
THIS is the reason for articulating LCD screens. I thin
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17480450
The photographer is lying on the ground looking up i assume to try and
get all of the CN Tower in the back ground.
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Can
and tomorrow we get the snow again
I like both of your stream shots, PJ - tranquil and inviting scenes
ann
P. J. Alling wrote:
Another from my not quite spring suite.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20lookingupstream.html
Equipment: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax FA 20-35mm f4
Another from my not quite spring suite.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20lookingupstream.html
Equipment: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax FA 20-35mm f4.0
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboo
Nice shot. I like it with the plain background like that.
Dave
Quoting Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quite a difference in technique for me with this one.
>
> Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld
> ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm
>
> Comment
nice on the exposure. I like the composition, it's very simple.
russell
On 9/28/06, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quite a difference in technique for me with this one.
>
> Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld
> ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_34
On 9/29/06, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quite a difference in technique for me with this one.
>
> Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld
> ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm
>
Gorgeous! I love the simple, starkness of it.
cheers,
frank
Photographically, I can't fault it, but the subject doesn't do anything for
me.
Might have more impact if it was B+W?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Looking up
> Quite a difference in t
I did play with the sky quite a bit and preferred what is shown.
Maybe what I like about it is the high key effect. I do appreciate
the look and opinion. It always helps me to work for improvement.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, September 29, 2006, 7:18:39 AM, you wrote:
C> Bruce Dayton wrot
Sorry to make you squint. I tried a lowering the background a bit and
didn't like it as well. Thanks for looking.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, September 29, 2006, 6:35:03 AM, you wrote:
GD> Yes, rather different from your usual: my eyes squint at the glare of
GD> the clouds above!
GD> You
This was some taller plant - not really a tree or bush. I really have
no idea what it might be called. Thanks for looking.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, September 29, 2006, 8:05:14 AM, you wrote:
RW> Beautiful! What kind of tree is this?
RW> Rick
RW> --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks, Paul. I bracketed the shots and played around with it PP and
and felt the high key worked best.
--
Bruce
Friday, September 29, 2006, 3:19:50 AM, you wrote:
PS> A nice composition. The effect is similar to shooting against a backlit
PS> screen in the studio. I like it.
PS> Paul
PS> On
Beautiful! What kind of tree is this?
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quite a difference in technique for me with this
> one.
>
> Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld
> ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm
>
> Comments welcome
>
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Quite a difference in technique for me with this one.
>
> Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld
> ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm
>
> Comments welcome
>
I like the try at a different perspective, but the glaring sky really
Yes, rather different from your usual: my eyes squint at the glare of
the clouds above!
You did a good job of rending on such a high contrast photo.
Godfrey
On Sep 28, 2006, at 10:36 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Quite a difference in technique for me with this one.
>
> Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @
A nice composition. The effect is similar to shooting against a backlit
screen in the studio. I like it.
Paul
On Sep 29, 2006, at 1:36 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Quite a difference in technique for me with this one.
>
> Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld
> ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5
>
> htt
Quite a difference in technique for me with this one.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld
ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
31 matches
Mail list logo