On 4/8/2010 10:18 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 4/8/2010 10:11 AM, David Parsons wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/4503229610/
I took the much maligned Takumar (Bayonet) 135 f/2.5 to a local
cemetery after having the lens on a shelf for about a year.
Maligned? I don't like mine quite
On 4/8/2010 10:11 AM, David Parsons wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/4503229610/
I took the much maligned Takumar (Bayonet) 135 f/2.5 to a local
cemetery after having the lens on a shelf for about a year.
Maligned? I don't like mine quite as much as I did the 3.5, but it's
still
Thought you were going to say that you had buried the lens. ;)
Crisp shot from an obviously unfairly maligned lens.
Jack
--- On Thu, 4/8/10, David Parsons wrote:
> From: David Parsons
> Subject: PESO - Pine cones
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Thursday, A
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/4503229610/
I took the much maligned Takumar (Bayonet) 135 f/2.5 to a local
cemetery after having the lens on a shelf for about a year.
--
Aloha Photographer Photoblog
http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://
4 matches
Mail list logo