In a message dated 6/6/2007 2:56:48 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie,
The problem is that the advancing wave of houses is
the subject, but they don't stand out in the photo.
Especially in #3, they lose to the mountains and
dramatic sky.
Nice pix, but they aren't
You're going to hate me but I kind of like the sky in wavebold, the
forground in wavemild and the houses in wavecolor...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I did the layer and mask thing. But note my selection lines may show
here and there, I will have smudge and blur and clone the edges so
In a message dated 6/6/2007 12:52:03 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You're going to hate me but I kind of like the sky in wavebold, the
forground in wavemild and the houses in wavecolor...
Well, it's honest, even if a bit difficult (to achieve).
Thanks
BW BOLD!
Incidentally, the color version has an overall blue cast.(?)
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I did the layer and mask thing. But note my selection lines
may show
here and there, I will have smudge and blur and clone the edges so
they are
not so visible.
For those of
In a message dated 6/6/2007 10:47:56 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Marnie,
The bold BW is in the right direction, but you need to go further
and get the whites in the houses brighter.
I also like the color rendering ... reduce blues, snap it up a bit
and it
In a message dated 6/6/2007 10:36:42 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No contest -- the color version has much more impact mainly due to the cloud
coloration.
Kenneth Waller
Thanks, Ken.
Mainly it's leaning toward BW Bold and Color. Guess I will show in
Marnie,
I like the Bold version best of the BWs. ;-)
With the risk of adding to confusion, I think the colour shot can have
even more punch if you play a little with a hue/saturation layer.
Try tweaking each of the colours separately. To _really_ bring out the
blue in the sky, you could
Add another vote for color. Too many pleasing tones there to go BW. If you
wanted even more impact, you could mask off the sky and then brighten and add
contrast to the foreground. Not a lot, just a touch.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In
In a message dated 6/6/2007 11:08:45 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Add another vote for color. Too many pleasing tones there to go BW. If you
wanted even more impact, you could mask off the sky and then brighten and add
contrast to the foreground. Not a lot, just a
In a message dated 6/6/2007 11:07:07 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is of course a risk of cartoonizing as Wheatfield calls it.
It's a nice shot to start with, and it holds potential for many
different expressions. It depends on what _you_ want with it!
jostein
Marnie,
The problem is that the advancing wave of houses is
the subject, but they don't stand out in the photo.
Especially in #3, they lose to the mountains and
dramatic sky.
Nice pix, but they aren't doing the job you want them
to, IMHO.
Rick
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I did the
Hi Marnie,
The bold BW is in the right direction, but you need to go further
and get the whites in the houses brighter.
I also like the color rendering ... reduce blues, snap it up a bit
and it will be quite nice.
Godfrey
On Jun 5, 2007, at 9:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I did
Okay, I did the layer and mask thing. But note my selection lines may show
here and there, I will have smudge and blur and clone the edges so they are
not so visible.
For those of you that have seen it before, uh, it looks different.
Now I am thinking maybe I like the color version better,
13 matches
Mail list logo
