I have uploaded two pictures I took with the Sigma+PK+Leica contraption.
http://www.leica-gallery.net/sngl
The two photos' names start with {Q-E}...
The buildings picture is at almost infinity, the porcelain figures is at
the closest distance of about 6 ft, with dedicated flash. The figures
p
I did unscrew the Elmar head (with elastic band and following
instruction gathered on google). It has a thread about 39.5mm and
very fine. Unusable.
The Tele-Elmar's head has a LTM 39mm thread. It is also 50% more
expensive than the Elmar. But it is said to have more saturated
color. I'll
At 04:00 26/02/04, you wrote:
I have an Elmar 135 f4 (M). Can I unscrew the head?
Yes!
>>I can only unscrew a little aluminum ring under the aperture ring.
It uncovers some screws. Should I go on?<<
Yes, I think so.
>>If it unscrews, I could maybe adapt the head to a Pentax zoom tube.<<
The pa
I have an Elmar 135 f4 (M). Can I unscrew the head?
I can only unscrew a little aluminum ring under the aperture ring.
It uncovers some screws. Should I go on?
If it unscrews, I could maybe adapt the head to a Pentax zoom tube.
Andre
At 12:26 25/02/04, you wrote:
Is is only the "head" of the lens that you attach?
Yes.
>>What lens is it?<<
A 1937 90mm/F4 lens from Leica.
Best regards
Sung Nee
>>could you post any of the pics<<
I took one but it's been heavily manipulated, so the original quality
doesn't show any more. I'll take some new ones.
Best regards
Sung Nee
I have finally managed to "uncover" the 2 pictures of attaching a Leica
screw mount lens to the Sigma SD10 via a PK mount, in the Leica Gallery:
http://www.leica-gallery.net/sngl.
The images have been double-posted because I didn't how to do it properly
at first. They are called line-up.jpg and
At 11:42 10/02/04, you wrote:
have
you any pictures of this set-up?
I have posted 2 pictures in the Leica Gallery:
http://www.leica-gallery.net, because this list does not allow images.
They are called line-up.jpg and complete.jpg. But I can't get to see the
images myself! I messed around with t
Now that would be a really geekie flame war...
At 02:11 AM 2/10/04, you wrote:
At 12:53 10/02/04, you wrote:
Why would you want a Stigma SD10 instead of a Pentax ist D?
Because I wanted to support Foveon's new technology. I think the Foveon
sensor are a better design, if only because there is no
Why would you want a Stigma SD10 instead of a Pentax ist D?
/Paul
From: Sung Nee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PK mount lenses
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:31:01 +0800
At 01:42 10/02/04, you wrote:
Pardon me? Are you saying that the Sigm
At 11:42 10/02/04, you wrote:
have
you any pictures of this set-up?
I'll try to get some done tonight. But I'll also have to figure out how to
post it to the site.
Best regards
Sung Nee
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: PK mount lenses
> I've never seen the Sigma mount, but I thought I read that it was a
K-Mount
> but that the lens rotated in the opposite direction to click into place.
I
> may be incorrect on that, though.
On 10 Feb 2004 at 10:12, Sung Nee wrote:
> Through a Pentax T2 focusing mount adaptor and a PK mount adaptor. The
> adaptor maker made it for me to get the M lens on my R body.
>
> To get it on the Pentax the adaptor-maker said just put on the PK mount
> adaptor instead of the Leica mount adapt
At 10:53 10/02/04, you wrote:
So how did you manage to fit a Leica M lens and what was the range of focal
distances?
Through a Pentax T2 focusing mount adaptor and a PK mount adaptor. The
adaptor maker made it for me to get the M lens on my R body.
To get it on the Pentax the adaptor-maker said j
On 10 Feb 2004 at 9:28, Sung Nee wrote:
>
> > I thought I read that it was a K-Mount
>
> I have no knowledge of the various mounts. I was informed by a lens adaptor
> maker that it's PK mount and I managed to put my PK mount adaptor onto the
> Sigma. Put a 120 Imagon and a Leica M 90 on it and
- Original Message -
From: "Sung Nee"
Subject: PK mount lenses
> I found out the so-called Sigma mount is in fact a PK
mount. I am trying to
> find out which Pentax wide-angle lens can be used on the
Sigma SD10, which
> has got a protective glass in front of
I found out the so-called Sigma mount is in fact a PK mount. I am trying to
find out which Pentax wide-angle lens can be used on the Sigma SD10, which
has got a protective glass in front of the mirror so that protruding rear
elements cannot get in.
I am looking for a lenses in the 14mm range, w
17 matches
Mail list logo
