Re: PUG Posts

2006-06-26 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Jun 26, 2006, at 7:33 AM, Tom C wrote: > I think one has to make the differentiation between judging each > other and > judging a photograph. There is a difference even though it's often > hard for > one to separate themselves from their work. Yes. Comment should be on the photographs, n

RE: PUG Posts

2006-06-26 Thread Tom C
Don Sanderson wrote: > >That's how I see the PDML, as a loose family. >We fight, bicker, criticize. >We also help, guide, console, and all the other nice stuff. >A family who "judges" each other doesn't stay together very long. > >Don I think one has to make the differentiation between judging ea

RE: PUG Posts

2006-06-23 Thread Don Sanderson
Bruce said: >I think what is important is to show work that we can be proud of, >work that we feel is representative of our creativity and skills, even >though those may change over time. > And Tom replied: >That's largely my point. Honestly look at an intended submission and ask >oneself if it

Re: PUG Posts

2006-06-23 Thread Tom C
Bruce wrote: > >This is slippery ground here. Each year as we improve our craft, our >quality goes up and the older photos don't hold up as well. So some >of mine have the same issue. But at the time I submitted them, they >may have been representative of my skills. So each year (if we are >im

Re: PUG Posts

2006-06-23 Thread Bruce Dayton
37 PM, you wrote: TC> Just to make a point (and feign a little humility), there's at least 9 of TC> mine in the gallery that I would not submit today, if I had to do it over. TC> Tom C. >>From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis

RE: PUG Posts

2006-06-23 Thread Tom C
Just to make a point (and feign a little humility), there's at least 9 of mine in the gallery that I would not submit today, if I had to do it over. Tom C. >From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >To: pdml@pdml.net >Subject:

RE: PUG Posts

2006-06-23 Thread Tom C
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], PDML , "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: PUG Posts >Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:18:34 -0500 > >Tom and Paul got me thinking and counting pictures posted to the PUG. > >Tom Cakalek has posted 32 >Pa

PUG Posts

2006-06-22 Thread Bob Sullivan
2nd try... -- Forwarded message -- From: Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jun 23, 2006 12:18 AM Subject: PUG Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], PDML , Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tom and Paul got me thinking and counting pictures posted to the PUG. Tom Cakalek has po

PUG Posts

2006-06-22 Thread Bob Sullivan
Tom and Paul got me thinking and counting pictures posted to the PUG. Tom Cakalek has posted 32 Paul Stenquest has posted 45 Here are the rest of the top contributors. Bruce Dayton 61 times! Champion by my count! Dan Matyola 58 Steve Larson 51 (still lurking?) Gianfranco Irlanda 48 (tough

Re: PUG posts

2001-09-01 Thread Peter Alling
I would think you could participate if you were Drinking Asahi Beer. At 02:31 AM 9/1/2001 -0400, Robert Harris wrote: >William Wooten wrote: > > > > Here's an idea. > > > > limit posts to PROFESSIONALS that only use Pentax bodies and > > Pentax lenses ... > > > > the photos must also be take

Re: PUG posts

2001-08-31 Thread Robert Harris
William Wooten wrote: > > Here's an idea. > > limit posts to PROFESSIONALS that only use Pentax bodies and > Pentax lenses ... > > the photos must also be take while standing > on one foot while rubbing their belly & patting their head > and sipping single malt scotch Can we make an except

Re: PUG posts

2001-08-31 Thread William Wooten
Here's an idea. limit posts to PROFESSIONALS that only use Pentax bodies and Pentax lenses ... the photos must also be take while standing on one foot while rubbing their belly & patting their head and sipping single malt scotch just thought I'd help Scoot - This message is from the Pent