Re: Pacific Imaging scanner (Was: Scanner Test (Revisited))

Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 5:19 AM Subject: Re: Pacific Imaging scanner (Was: Scanner Test (Revisited)) AFAIK, the PF3650 is a PF3600 with ICE, GEM, etc. So it should be similar to mine, with more goodies. I'm happy with the 3600, but have not used

Re: Pacific Imaging scanner (Was: Scanner Test (Revisited))

: Pacific Imaging scanner (Was: Scanner Test (Revisited)) Thanks, Lon. My main reason for the 3650 was wanting to start a whole roll scan and leave it to work, but it sounds like that isn't a real good idea. Will probably go with the Minolta and have a couple hundred $ to put to work somewhere

Re: Pacific Imaging scanner (Was: Scanner Test (Revisited))

I never use mine. It's just a hassle. CW - Original Message - From: Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 12:11 PM Subject: Pacific Imaging scanner (Was: Scanner Test (Revisited)) Lon - How happy are you with the Pacific Imaging scanner