On 18 Aug 2004 at 14:42, Steve Jolly wrote:
> Of course, the downside of pellicle mirrors is that light can leak back
> through the viewfinder and cause veiling flare... you'd need some kind
> of optional viewfinder shutter - perhaps an LCD in front of the eyepiece?
>
> S
The Oly E-10 DSLRs us
fra wrote:
But that way, one would loose the benefits of rangefinder/TLR-like
viewing. Which are tremendous. I thing I would still like the
pellicle concept, the best is that you both see the subject all the
time, even during exposure, and that is has SLR precise framing,
unlike RFs. Why did I then
But that way, one would loose the benefits of rangefinder/TLR-like
viewing. Which are tremendous. I thing I would still like the
pellicle concept, the best is that you both see the subject all the
time, even during exposure, and that is has SLR precise framing,
unlike RFs. Why did I then enter into
7;s too bad I'm not allowed to patent things myself :-)
>
> fra: fra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> dato: 2004/08/18 on PM 02:00:37 CEST
> til: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> emne: Re: Pellicle Mirrors (was: Re: Prosumer vs. DSLR (was Re: two new
>
> Akin to an LCD shutte
rom: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 6:49 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Pellicle Mirrors (was: Re: Prosumer vs. DSLR (was Re: two new
digicams...)
On 17/8/04, fra, discombobulated, offered:
I am more thinking that with increasing sensor sensitivity, we could
see a pellicle mi
Don Sanderson wrote on 17.08.04 14:04:
> Not that big a deal Cotty, it's also called a "semi-silvered" mirror.
> Lets some light thru, reflects some.
> A lot like the "one way" mirrors you've seen.
> Here's a page on the Canon F-1 that shows some advantages and disadvantages:
> http://www.cameraqu
about the long URL, you'll have to copy and paste it.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 6:49 AM
> To: pentax list
> Subject: Pellicle Mirrors (was: Re: Prosumer vs. DSLR (was Re: two new
> digicams...)
&
On 17/8/04, fra, discombobulated, offered:
>I am more thinking that with increasing sensor sensitivity, we could
>see a pellicle mirror DSLR. Imagine it - very fast, very quiet, no
>dust on the sensor,... Is it possible to have AF in pellicle mirrror
>one? Where would be the sensors?
Can anyone r
8 matches
Mail list logo
