Re: Telescopes instead of super telephotos? (WAS: Pentax-A* 1200/8 ED IF)

2002-05-06 Thread george de fockert
> George wrote: > > > >That must be very irrational, because pentax has more interresting > >telescopes in that focal range. > >And these have the additional advantage, that they can be used for medium > >format ! > > > How are these telescopes for ordinary photography? Do they compare in > qualit

Re: Telescopes instead of super telephotos? (WAS: Pentax-A* 1200/8 ED IF)

2002-05-06 Thread Pål Audun Jensen
Now this one look pretty expensive! http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/product/sougan/big/p250sd.jpg - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Telescopes instead of super telephotos? (WAS: Pentax-A* 1200/8 ED IF)

2002-05-05 Thread Pål Audun Jensen
George wrote: >That must be very irrational, because pentax has more interresting >telescopes in that focal range. >And these have the additional advantage, that they can be used for medium >format ! How are these telescopes for ordinary photography? Do they compare in quality and price? Pål

Re: Pentax-A* 1200/8 ED IF

2002-05-01 Thread george de fockert
From: "Pål Audun Jensen" > Has anyone actually used or even seen this lens? Just curious... > > (I admit having an irrational lust for this lens...) > > > Pål > That must be very irrational, because pentax has more interresting telescopes in that focal range. And these have the additional advanta

Re: Provia 1600F? (Was Re: Pentax-A* 1200/8 ED IF)

2002-05-01 Thread Aaron Reynolds
On Monday, April 29, 2002, at 11:19 AM, Mishka wrote: > I could have been hallicinating, but I think I remeber seeing Provia > 1600 last weekend at local photo store. I could swear I saw that, but > now I cannot find any mention of that even on FujiFilm web site. Kinda > makes me wonder what the

Re: Pentax-A* 1200/8 ED IF

2002-04-30 Thread Pål Audun Jensen
BTW I see that in Japan the A* 1200/8 cost only 10% more than the FA* 600/4. At least around here the price difference is much larger. It seems to cost $8500 in Japan. Not too bad relatively speaking. Pål - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.p

Re: Pentax-A* 1200/8 ED IF

2002-04-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I had fun taking the half-dozen or so shots I took before selling my SMC Takumar 500/4.5 + 1.4X (700mm) lens. But the 400/5.6 PKA is ever so much lighter and so much easier to set up and use, esp. with manual focus. I've decided that 400 is plenty focal length for me. Pål wrote: (I admi

Re: Provia 1600F? (Was Re: Pentax-A* 1200/8 ED IF)

2002-04-29 Thread David Brooks
0F? (Was Re: Pentax-A* 1200/8 ED IF) I could have been hallicinating, but I think I remeber seeing Provia 1600 last weekend at local photo store. I could swear I saw that, but now I cannot find any mention of that even on FujiFilm web site. Kinda makes me wonder what they put in the air circ. sy

Provia 1600F? (Was Re: Pentax-A* 1200/8 ED IF)

2002-04-29 Thread Mishka
I could have been hallicinating, but I think I remeber seeing Provia 1600 last weekend at local photo store. I could swear I saw that, but now I cannot find any mention of that even on FujiFilm web site. Kinda makes me wonder what they put in the air circ. system in that building... > Actually, m

Re: Pentax-A* 1200/8 ED IF

2002-04-29 Thread Bill D. Casselberry
Pål wrote: > (I admit having an irrational lust for this lens...) nothing to be ashamed of - happens to us all if we get ourselves into the "telephoto thing" ;^)Bill - Bill D. Casselberry

Re: Pentax-A* 1200/8 ED IF

2002-04-29 Thread Pål Audun Jensen
Fred wrote: >I can just imagine the tripod stability and strength needed for a >1200/8 lens. I find that the A* 600/5.6 is big enough as is, and I >assume that the 600/4 users must really have their hands full, and I >can only imagine what's involved in using a 1200/8. Actually, my interest i

Re: Pentax-A* 1200/8 ED IF

2002-04-29 Thread Fred
> Has anyone actually used or even seen this lens? Just curious... > (I admit having an irrational lust for this lens...) Not I, Pål, although I can empathize with your "irrational lust" to try one - . I've never seen one, and I've not ever seen a user report on it, either. I guess a few of the

Re: Pentax-A* 1200/8 ED IF

2002-04-29 Thread Pentxuser
One day several years ago I was talking to Pentax Canada and they said they had one and were looking to get rid of it. I bet if you contacted them they might still have it. Who knows, you could mortgage your house In a message dated 4/29/02 7:58:38 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Re: Pentax-A* 1200/8 ED IF

2002-04-29 Thread Steve Larson
You and me both (having an irrational lust for this lens). Close focus of 26 feet is what puts me over the edge. I could sell the cars and mortgage the house, if I really had to have one though. Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California Pål Audun Jensen wrote: Has anyone actually used or even seen

Pentax-A* 1200/8 ED IF

2002-04-29 Thread Pål Audun Jensen
Has anyone actually used or even seen this lens? Just curious... (I admit having an irrational lust for this lens...) Pål - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at