Re: Pentax-F 4-5.6/35-85mm vs. Tokina AT-X 270 AF Pro II

2004-10-30 Thread Keith Whaley
ladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 10:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pentax-F 4-5.6/35-85mm vs. Tokina AT-X 270 AF Pro II I have now posted test shots done with these two lenses. Taking into account that I paid app. 10% for the Pentax lens (used: 57 USD) compared to

RE: Pentax-F 4-5.6/35-85mm vs. Tokina AT-X 270 AF Pro II

2004-10-30 Thread Don Sanderson
ROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 10:58 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Pentax-F 4-5.6/35-85mm vs. Tokina AT-X 270 AF Pro II > > > I have now posted test shots done with these two lenses. Taking > into account > that I paid app. 10% for the Pentax lens (use

Re: Pentax-F 4-5.6/35-85mm vs. Tokina AT-X 270 AF Pro II

2004-10-30 Thread Caveman
I'd say that the Pentax will do a great job for 4x6 prints. Jens Bladt wrote: http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/c97627.html Comments are welcome

Pentax-F 4-5.6/35-85mm vs. Tokina AT-X 270 AF Pro II

2004-10-30 Thread Jens Bladt
I have now posted test shots done with these two lenses. Taking into account that I paid app. 10% for the Pentax lens (used: 57 USD) compared to the Tokina lens (which I got like new for the whole sale price: 732 USD - annother custumer had chosen the SMC FA 2.8/28-70mm instead) - I think the Penta