> On Feb 25, 2020, at 1:37 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
>
> On 25/2/20, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> I have. It images well, albeit a good bit of the imaging is lost due to
>> the 2x crop (better on APS-C where it has a little more space to work with).
>>
>> Ervgonomically,
On 25/2/20, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I have. It images well, albeit a good bit of the imaging is lost due to
>the 2x crop (better on APS-C where it has a little more space to work with).
>
>Ervgonomically, it's twisty. It has a very light focusing helicoid with
>a short
I have. It images well, albeit a good bit of the imaging is lost due to the 2x
crop (better on APS-C where it has a little more space to work with).
Ervgonomically, it’s twisty. It has a very light focusing helicoid with a short
throw for the SLR AF, which makes manual focus precision a little
On 25/2/20, l...@red4est.com, discombobulated, unleashed:
>No but I could, I do have an adapter. What's the question?
You've just answered it ;-)
No, I was wondering what it's like with the MFT adapter. Obvs the sensor won't
reach the corners so I imagine - as with all 'full frame' lenses on
No but I could, I do have an adapter. What's the question?
On February 25, 2020 10:46:42 AM PST, Steve Cottrell wrote:
>Out of interest, has anyone on the list ever paired this lens with a
>Micro Four Thirds (MFT) camera?
>
>--
>
>
>Cheers,
> Cotty
>
>
>___/\__ UK Shoot / Edit
>|| (O)
Out of interest, has anyone on the list ever paired this lens with a Micro Four
Thirds (MFT) camera?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__ UK Shoot / Edit
|| (O) |
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
6 matches
Mail list logo
