Re: Pentax ring flash

2007-02-27 Thread Jan van Wijk
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:51:13 -0500, J wrote: >Has any one on the list used the Pentax made ring flash on a digital >ist d or other ? You mean the AF-140C I guess, I have used that on the LX as well as the Z1, and later the *istD. It works quite well, allthough sometimes I do need a bit of comp

Pentax ring flash

2007-02-26 Thread J
Has any one on the list used the Pentax made ring flash on a digital ist d or other ? And what were the results as this flash will do TTL. I am talking about the first one they made around the time of the LX..Thanks J -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listi

Re: the Pentax ring flash

2004-01-07 Thread Ann Sanfedele
Fred wrote: > > > I really don't think of it as a real auction - just a note that if > > someone wan'ts it and is dragging his heels and has more than that > > I'd love it, and I'm not going to do another note to the whole > > list on this. > > I understand, Ann. However, your original ad (in th

Re: the Pentax ring flash

2004-01-07 Thread Leon Altoff
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:37:26 + (GMT), Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: >Step-down, I think (narrower filter than lens thread). Has anybody >tried it? Any vignetting? I also ordered the Reverse Holder K, which >allows to attach the AF080C to a reversed lens. Can't wait to get it >(and for spring/summ

Re: the Pentax ring flash

2004-01-07 Thread Kostas Kavoussanakis
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Fred wrote: > The only difference that mattered to me was, in fact, those 49mm > threads - one of the adapters that comes with the 140 has allowed me > to use it with both the A 100/2.8 Macro and the A* 200/4 Macro (both > 58mm threads), but I guess I probably could have gotten

Re: the Pentax ring flash

2004-01-06 Thread Ann Sanfedele
graywolf wrote: > > We forgive you Ann. > > By the way, "or best offer" does not mean "to the highest bidder", it means it > means, I would like to get X for it, but will sell it to the one who offers the > closest to that. It is the opposite of "firm". > Duh -- I really DIDN"T know that! I w

Re: the Pentax ring flash

2004-01-06 Thread graywolf
We forgive you Ann. By the way, "or best offer" does not mean "to the highest bidder", it means it means, I would like to get X for it, but will sell it to the one who offers the closest to that. It is the opposite of "firm". -- Ann Sanfedele wrote: Fred wrote: I have a solid $100 bid on it

Re: the Pentax ring flash

2004-01-06 Thread Pentxuser
Anne wrote But even if you are being a crumudgeon, thanks for the added info, below. I used mine with a 100 f 4 macro and a 50mm f 4 macro, both of which have 49mm threads (they are about 20 years old) annsan I've used mine with step up rings right up to 58mm. Team a 100-300 up with nikon close

Re: the Pentax ring flash

2004-01-06 Thread Ann Sanfedele
Fred wrote: > > > I have a solid $100 bid on it from someone across > > the big pond... > > Reminder that it has 49mm threads. Anyone in for > > more? > > I'm sure that we (almost) all agree that it's OK to mention items > that we personally are selling here (and many of us have done so), > but

the Pentax ring flash

2004-01-06 Thread Ann Sanfedele
I have a solid $100 bid on it from someone across the big pond... Reminder that it has 49mm threads. Anyone in for more? annsan